User talk:Joseywales1961

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C[edit]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About reliable citations[edit]

I'm working on the article for Curious and thought I was using proper citations. Could you indicate which ones are not reliable enough so I change/delete them? Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Senyeri (talk • contribs)

Hi Sonyeri see in this screenshot below, this is how the sources appear use a source checking tool, the one highlighted in red are considered unreliable. Thank you for your contributions Josey Wales^Parley 14:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I read about the possibility of using youtube videos as a last resource in case the information cannot be found on a written format. Could it be possible to keep them or is it better to take them down? Sonyeri (talk · contribs)

You can leave them there, but it is best to try and get a better source (doesn't have to be on the web, maybe a ladies magazine or something like that) Josey Wales^Parley 14:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. I'll try to look for those one more time. In the meantime, could it be possible to remove the unreliable sources tag from the article? Sonyeri (talk · contribs)