Talk:Capricon

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 October 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Capriconchair (talk · contribs)

Untitled[edit]

True, the Capricon chair (myself) did create this page, but I strove to be as neutral as possible in order to avoid a Conflict of Interest. If there is an issue in the neutrality of this page, then please let me know what it is so that it can be fixed. Also, as you can see, I created a new account to avoid the username conflict issue. Lmv4321 08:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revisions of November 2015[edit]

Consistent with the discussion at the "articles for deletion" nomination, I have converted this into a list article. To do this, most of the introductory material was removed (and I note that much of this material did not address the convention itself, but the sponsoring organization). I also made clear that most of the material in the table came from the web site for the organization, and gave an explicit link to the specific web site page that is hosting that information. Finally, I made the infobox more general with respect to its location (because it was telling us about the venue of the upcoming convention, which I found inappropriately promotional) and removed the unsourced statement as to attendance. Regarding the latter point, if reliable attendance figures exist for particular years, they should be appear (with references, of course) in a new column in the table. I also removed some unnecessary external links and a few instances of over-linking in the article.

I did not verify the information in the table. I also note that some of the web pages for earlier conventions still exist and an interested editor might be able to make the post-1998 referencing more robust by citing to those particular web sites (as opposed to relying on the single list in the site for the 2016 convention).

NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Capricon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]