User talk:NikolaiSergevichKutzenov

>Please do not contact me via talk page, otherwise, it will be removed by me. contact me at my email at <redacted>

No, that's not how things work on WIkipedia. We prefer to discuss here out in the open, where everybody can see it. If you can't abide by that, this might not be a place for you. I've removed your email from this message so it won't be scraped by spambots. You can enable the "email this user" feature by adding your email in your user preferences. Acroterion (talk) 14:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i have an auto spam removal extension NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (talk) 16:16, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

? NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (talk) 16:11, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:11, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diffs, for the record: [1] vs [2]; [3] vs [4] EvergreenFir (talk) 16:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what? my ban has been revoked on my old account. this is my new account.i have no puppet. NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (talk) 16:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which old account? EvergreenFir (talk) 16:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i used t have an account called nikonovnikolai, which is permanently banned. i made some actions previously which i now regret. NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (talk) 16:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the reason i rmeoved so much on 3 was because i was adding a more descriptive description of those steps, as you cna see on the preceeding and suceeding edits. NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (talk) 16:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

how is 1 2 or 3 disruptive? i jsut added back non disruptive eddits from my previous account.the 4th was my own draft. NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (talk) 16:20, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my ban has been revoked on my old ip adress. this is my new account.i have no puppet.i used to have an account called nikonovnikolai, which is permanently banned. i made some actions previously which i now regret.NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (talk) 16:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, as you point out, you -- not your account -- are permanently banned. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

that is literally the exact opposite of what i said, i said my old account is permanetly banned, not me. my ip used to be banned. NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (talk) 16:40, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You misunderstand. There may have been a block on your IP that has expired, but you, the person behind the computer screen, are blocked from editing until you are able to successfully appeal the block of you main account. It is against policy for you to edit under any account or IP even if you are technically able to create a new account or edit as an IP due to an expired IP block. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:09, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i do not misunderstand, the thing i do not understand is why i was banned. links 1, 2, 3 and 4 provided by EverGreenFir all have no disruptive editing nor do they have disputes. they are me correcting pages, since someone reverted normal edits of my old account, just because i was banned, without any correct reason, and 4th is just a draft of an article of my old account. on no recent occasion, nor on this account have i disruptive-ly edited without me noticing what i had done, and quickly reverting it, except for a few cases.if you would like, i could provide my ip address to prove i do not have any active alt accounts at all, nor have i ever edited while being an ip address. this can not even be counted as edit wars which can be counted as disruptive editing. the only edit wars i have ever participated in is while i was making normal edits, and clicked publish and coincidentally someone else happened to be editing, making us merge edits. I admit, i have done disruptive editing on this account, although at the time i thought it was normal editing, but that has also since been sorted and i now admit it. link 4 was an edit by my old account made in april, and that account has since been banned and i no longer use, and i have already been held responsible for that mistake, and apologize for it. link 3 is just me moving paragraphs and sentences,and adding much more description to them and sometimes replacing them for lack of description.I would also like to point out i cannot be sockpuppet of NikonovNikolai my old banned account, which i now regret my actions on, since it is for one,permanently banned, and two, not in use.Please believe me when i say my edits are made in Good faith. I hope you understand, please have a nice day.NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (talk) 17:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Maybe it is a language or cultural barrier, but you greatly misunderstand this situation. You must return to your original account and appeal your ban there. If you make another appeal on this page, your ability to edit it will be removed. 331dot (talk) 19:09, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You will need to appeal via WP:UTRS as your original account does not have talk page access. 331dot (talk) 19:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

all i have tried to do is add information to wikipedia, and am returned with this.russian wikipedia is where i will stay. NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (talk)

why did you even unban my ip address if ypu just came back to annoy me anyway. i already previously requested an unban on the ticket system, but came up with "ticket not found". i havent done anything wrong.NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (talk)

IP addresses are never blocked indefinitely. The block on the IP expired, it was not removed. Searching your old username on UTRS did not bring up any results, did you appeal under your IP address? You should appeal under your old account name. The UTRS system does not work correctly if a user makes many appeals close together. 331dot (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i dont want to return to english wikipedia anyway. I am fine.I prefer Russian. NikolaiSergevichKutzenov (talk) 19:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]