User talk:Adem20/Archive 7

Disambiguation link notification for May 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shahzadpur, Haryana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A3 violation on Lil Juan[edit]

So, you recently put an A3 tag on an article Lil Juan. See WP:A3 to read the rules on the placement of that speedy deletion template, notably:

Don't use it on new articles.
Don't use it if the page has only an infobox.

Thank you! GabetheEditor^(talk_cont) 13:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for warning me. I'll try to be a bit more careful. Adem20^talk 15:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Authority control request[edit]

Would you mind adding it to his brother, Jean-François-Xavier Noguès, please?Zigzig20s (talk) 15:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done [1] --Adem20^talk 15:41, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPP[edit]

Please return to this article: Jvs Sri Chaitanya Junior College, and include a rational for the PROD you tagged. Several concerns have been expressed about your new page patrolling - if you continue to make too many errors you may be asked to stop patrolling pages. Thanks.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:30, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I took back the changes I made on the page you specified. --Adem20^talk 09:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ngong Road Forest[edit]

You might want to review the A1 criteria. "If any information in the title or on the page, including links, allows an editor, possibly with the aid of a web search, to find further information on the subject in an attempt to expand or edit it, A1 is not appropriate". The source I added is literally the first g-hit.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Smith[edit]

I'd appreciate if you could either delete or edit heavily the Patrick Smith part of the youtubers list I made a mistake and didn't realize if you could do that it would be great thanks. 21vromano (talk) 15:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Adem20^talk 15:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ahl-e-Sunnat-Wal-Jammat, Kilkenny City Tours[edit]

It seems you did not notify the author of the issues you tagged. It seems also that this article should probably have been tagged for deletion. Concerns have been expressed several times about your page patrolling. Please try to get it right or you will be asked to stop Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm stopped patrolling new pages. I'll be a little more careful now. Thank you very much for your information.--Adem20^talk 13:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you've started up again.😢Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your speedy edits[edit]

Hi Adem20! I see that you try to do edits on Turkey related articles. So, you add WikiProject tags to articles. However, you do this so fast that you don't allow the creator of the article to add the WikiProject tags by himself. It created "Edit conflict". Please be patient and wait some time in the future. You can just check the user whether he has experience enough to do it by himself. Thank you. CeeGee 11:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yukarıdaki yazım lisan olarak anlaşılmadıysa Türkçesini yazabilirim. CeeGee 11:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for warning me.--Adem20^talk 12:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hi i saw your massage thank you for warning what shall i do now? please help me to improve my article(Marajjjjj (talk) 09:21, 13 May 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Done I removed the copyrighted content on your article. For your information. --Adem20^talk 09:26, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Hello Adem20. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Arya Nandini. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. - Mr X 15:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding my amazement as that was very bitey and you could not have searched for info w/ which to improve article in that length of time.Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for informing me. --Adem20^talk 16:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

U R welcome. However, you always say that after posts about your errors, including inappropriately A3 tagging. The behavior continues unabated. I'm pinging @Kudpung: to see if they have further input as they have raised similar concerns and warned you earlier.Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for all the old things I did. I will not use the A3 tag again. --Adem20^talk 16:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

This is a formal admin request, Please refrain from patrolling pages. If you do not stop now, your editing privileges may be affected. Thanks.

Bu resmi bir yönetici isteğidir, lütfen devriye sayfalarından kaçının. Şimdi durmazsanız düzenleme ayrıcalıklarınız etkilenebilir. Teşekkürler. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm stopped patrolling new pages. --Adem20^talk 09:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Turan Falcıoğlu[edit]

The article Turan Falcıoğlu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 04:35, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4[edit]

Hello Adem20,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 819 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Recep İvedik 5 (June 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are no in-line citations. But even the external links appear to be nothing more than announcements or informational listings. There has been no demonstration that this film meets the criteria set forth in WP:NFILM.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Recep İvedik 5 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Adem20, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yılmaz Öztuna (June 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Waggie was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources appear (as best I can tell through Google Translate) to be all obituaries. As he is recently deceased, this is pertinent to the WP:BLP policy. Also, Wikipedia articles are summarized from what secondary, reliable sources say about a topic. All the references are WP:REFBOMB'd at the beginning and nothing else is sourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yılmaz Öztuna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waggie (talk) 19:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

further comment[edit]

Actually, BLP does not apply. Since the obits are reliable sources that he died he is not subject to BLP--it sometimes applies to the recently deaf for a year o two, but not 5. The problem is that the key material is about his books and journalism, and though it is present in the obits, it has to be actualy written in the article. This would need to be done by someone who knows Turkish--the GTranslate is not clear eough about titles and Englsih equivalents. The education is a good start, but the article has to be finished. DGG ( talk ) 12:27, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for letting me know.--Adem20^talk 13:46, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking pages[edit]

Hi Adem20, you seem to be blanking a whole bundle of of pages. Do you want me to help you get references, so they can be returned back into userspace. I can spend the next couple of months to help you find references, if you want, and showing you how you can construct an article which won't be deleted. scope_creep (talk) 11:26, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I want all the pages I created in the draft space to be deleted. --Adem20^talk 11:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong armenian Wikipedia logo[edit]

The SVG armenian Wikipedia logo have truncated letters. How can I fix?

--2001:B07:6442:8903:F156:DA41:5FE:5283 (talk) 13:52, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can create a user account and fix it with Inkscape program. --Adem20^talk 13:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Adem20, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
- User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
- User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:

Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]