Talk:Woman VI

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Pittsburgh/Art Since 1945 (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Peer Review[edit]

Jinghan,

I think your articles are coming along very nicely! You have clearly done a lot of research, and it shows in your writing. I really liked that you linked to the pages of some major concepts and important phrases that people might not necessarily know a lot about and want to reference for context as they are reading your article. (Examples: decolonization, the McCarthy era) I would continue to do that throughout your articles. I also liked the way you split up the article - each subtopic/heading is relevant and the overall flow of the article is coherent and easy to follow. One thing I would suggest would be to combine the headings of Artist and Abstract Expressionism, because you don't have a lot of text at the moment under either of those headings, and de Kooning was an Abstract Expressionist, so it would definitely be easy to and make sense to consolidate those paragraphs. I would also be careful to do a spelling and grammar check in your sandbox (if that's possible) before moving to the main-space, as I noticed some minor spelling and grammar errors. Otherwise, this page is looking great!

Richathanyou (talk) 23:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

If de Kooning painted a whole series of "Women," why single this one out for an article? The lede does not provide significant justification for this. Recommend using this article as a basis to develop an article on the "Woman" series as a whole. Aolivex (talk) 18:45, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Organization[edit]

This article has several problems with organization:

several sections appear to be irrelevant to the central topic
the flow of sections is neither unified nor logical
the "visual analysis" section reads like a long list; recommend integrating it into a discussion of the painting's importance, or striking. Aolivex (talk) 18:48, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]