Talk:Las Reinas del Pueblo

Las Reinas del Pueblo was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 29, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Latin music: Regional Mexican music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Regional Mexican music task force.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

Unsuccessful. Nominator inactivity resulted in closure. If AJona1992 returns, they should make the changes outlined below and put this page back at GAN. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Las Reinas del Pueblo/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 06:40, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Some referencing nagging issues as well as a few copy changes, but it can be improved to GA level. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes[edit]

Lead[edit]

Posthumously released on April 4, 1995, by EMI Latin in the wake of Selena's death on March 31, 1995 That's two year references and should be reworded.

Background[edit]

A resurgence of interest in Selena's music helped three of her other albums ... re-entering the Top Latin Albums chart, Removing the dashed aside reveals that "re-entering" should be "re-enter".

Music[edit]

It commences with Selena's "Como la Flor" (1992), a commercially and critically acclaimed piece widely regarded as Selena's signature song, "Como la Flor" has become a posthumous epithet and swan song, as well as her most renowned recording. This sentence must be split. The obvious place to do so is to take the comma after "signature song" and make it a period.
Selena's "Bidi Bidi Bom Bom", the fifth song, features lyrics that originally portrayed a jubilant fish swimming freely in the ocean, before it transitioned into a cumbia and reggae song. The comma after "ocean" is not needed.
The ninth track, Selena's "¿Qué Creías?", functions as a "kiss-off anthem", that Selena claimed represents "all the ladies". maybe "which" instead of "that"
"Tu Recado," Should be logical quotes: comma outside of quotation mark.

Critical and commercial performance[edit]

A parallel appraisal by Pat Muir in the TCA Regional News As one of Wikipedia's heaviest users of ProQuest, I smell a problem. TCA (Tribune Content Agency) stories are reprints from other newspapers. Sometimes, they are not newspapers available by themselves in ProQuest! Go down to the bottom and you'll find the correct newspaper to cite: (c)2015 Yakima Herald-Republic (Yakima, Wash.) Visit Yakima Herald-Republic (Yakima, Wash.) at www.yakima-herald.com Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Both of the 2015 Pat Muir stories should be credited to the Yakima Herald-Republic, in text and in references.
- I also object to this being a "parallel" appraisal when the Muir stories are 15 years later than Ramiro Burr's Express-News columns.
Lifting the "moods and themes" from AllMusic for AllMusic characterizes the album's prevailing ambiance as spicy, street-smart, exuberant, sensual, and celebratory. might not be the hottest thing to do.

Sourcing and spot checks[edit]

Encouragement: Clip newspapers.com citations so users without subscriptions can access them. I have done this in this article.

The Houston Chronicle article should be credited to La Vibra. I fixed a lot of little ref issues.

3: Cross-checked to another database I have with this article. There seems to be some issues with sfnref because of all the citations to Lannert in 1995. The correct one is the June 10 article, which checks out. Y
5: Also a Billboard ref, which checks out. Y
15: "one of Selena's most popular songs" Not sure this justifies the claim of it being the most popular though.
21: "Speaking for all ladies..." not "all the ladies". Quote fidelity needs improvement. It's also not a quote as the article is paraphrasing her words. Please fix.
25: Three-star rating at AllMusic. Y

Images[edit]

The only image is non-free album art with NFCC and alt text.

Status?[edit]

@Sammi Brie and AJona1992: this has been on hold for over three weeks now. Maybe it's time to close it as failed? RoySmith (talk) 16:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith Unfortunately, AJona1992 hasn't edited since December 2, so going to close due to nominator inactivity. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.