Talk:Judy Chicago/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 22:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Classification under Illinois, Chicago questionable

This article is about; an artist, a feminist artist, an installation artist, a collaborative artist. These would be apropriate classifications. As an artist, her importance is not in question.Rawkcuf (talk) 21:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Rawkcuf.

Exhibition

Exhibition announcements in the present tense, out of date, are odd; suspect.Rawkcuf (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Rawkcuf.

Work needed

There are no dates for "The Dinner Part," there is no explanation of whence the name she dropped came; and the writing is at times less than elegant.211.225.30.91 (talk) 02:58, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm currently working on expanding/rewriting this article. Hope folks don't mind. It needs major work. SarahStierch (talk) 21:33, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

I find no evidence anywhere that Judy Cohen/Gerowitz ever successfully changed her name to Chicago in any legal capacity or on any legal document. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.14.175.114 (talk) 13:38, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

The sources, I found, all come from reliable secondary sources. As the person who re-wrote this article, after writing my master's thesis about Chicago, I feel pretty confident in my citing. (I'm not the foremost authority, (re: Wikipedia:Expert editors) but, I'm not sure what is really challengeable here without explaining where you were researching for this information) I don't believe there are problems with neutrality. I don't really understand the neutrality claims, and your edit summary claims plagiarism, which is a pretty serious (and dare I say insulting) thing to say to any Wikipedian or scholar when writing content. O_o I'm going to remove the neutrality template, as no where on the talk page does it discuss why the article is not neutral. SarahStierch (talk) 18:49, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Questionable category

I can find no evidence that Judy Chicago ever was a faculty member at California State University, Fullerton though I did find evidence that she exhibited her work there. I did find evidence that she was a visiting faculty member in art at Fresno State.

Geezertoo (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC).

It was an accident. It should have been California State University, Fresno. SarahStierch (talk) 00:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Harvey Mudd

I think there was a link to an incorrect "Harvey Mudd". I removed that link here. My preliminary guess is that this is the correct "Harvey Mudd". Bus stop (talk) 17:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Sources, Weasel Words and the Question of "Judy Chicago's" legal name change

Please do not remove hats on this page until an objectively satisfactory conclusion has been reached on the question of whether or not Judy Chicago's name was ever legally changed.

exhibit at radcliffe

There's a big new exhibit at Harvard this summer from her archives; the page might be useful for the article: http://www.radcliffe.harvard.edu/schlesinger-library/exhibit/judy-chicago-through-the-archives -- phoebe / (talk to me) 00:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 20:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judy Chicago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140227074456/http://www.judychicago.com/about/career-history.php to http://www.judychicago.com/about/career-history.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:54, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Source Needed

The intro paragraph states that Judy Chicago coined the term feminist art. Source or sources needed for claim. The relevance and necessity of this statement are debatable. Feministkilljoy (talk) 15:06, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

I removed that bit. Binksternet (talk) 16:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

The article sounds as if it is written by its subject

It's never a good idea for a Wikipedia article about a person to be written by that person. This ought to be obvious.2601:200:C000:1A0:A5A4:4D74:42A8:1F20 (talk) 03:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

I dunno... anything is possible, but there are eighty or so sources for a couple of dozen paragraphs. Chicago seems a bit busy to have time for this, and while octogenarians spending their time filling in citation templates on Wikipedia isn't unknown it stretches credulity a bit as a new hobby for someone who was being reviewed in The New York Times half a century ago and whose work was being debated on the floor of the US Congress a few years later... 71.192.14.27 (talk) 05:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)