Talk:Graffiti in Ancient Rome

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose that Graffiti in Ancient Rome be merged into Roman graffiti, or that Roman graffiti be merged into Graffiti in Ancient Rome, since both articles cover the same material. I see no reason why the information should be divided into separate articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.79.45.246 (talk) 17:31, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Zoozaz1 talk 18:10, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support The articles cover the same subject. Ewf9h-bg (talk) 18:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Roman graffiti: this article is little more than a stub; "Roman graffiti" is more developed, and has a wider scope, not being limited to the confines of Rome itself; and there's no obvious advantage to having a separate article about Roman graffiti at Rome, as opposed to Roman graffiti elsewhere. If further development of the article demonstrates sufficient reason for having one, it can always be split off again. P Aculeius (talk) 15:18, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]