Talk:Dan David (businessman)

Date of death

The he: article says it was the 5th. Which is correct? --Dweller (talk) 09:24, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dan David. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425145608/http://www.dandavidprize.org/laureates/laureates-2012/128-2012-past-historybiography/339--robert-conquest.html to http://www.dandavidprize.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425145608/http://www.dandavidprize.org/laureates/laureates-2012/128-2012-past-historybiography/339--robert-conquest.html to http://www.dandavidprize.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

History Prize.

Several claims are made, which are sourced to public relations outlets, which, generally, are not reliable sources. Had the entry been neutrally worded, I would have had little objections, but it sounds like a press release, or a blurb from the website of the foundation. Kleuske (talk) 11:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

The format of the prize has been changed, this can be verified both from the website of the prize and the media material, and the new text reflects that. The old text no longer reflects the reality of the prize and is outdated. Not sure what you found insufficiently neutral about the entry, but then it would make more sense to suggest some more acceptable language rather than revert to an outdated version. I tried to change the sourcing of the material to remove the press release (there are now several news stories about it) but you deleted it again. Trowel123 (talk) 12:37, 2 September 2021 (UTC)