User talk:Ziyaurr

Speedy deletion nomination of Dudher Kuthi Dewan Bosh[edit]

Hello Ziyaurr,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dudher Kuthi Dewan Bosh for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Gachangi (talk) 14:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Dudher Kuthi Dewan Bosh. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. agtx 17:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dudher Kuthi Dewan Bosh, you may be blocked from editing. Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk 18:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ziyaurr/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 10:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ziyaurr, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 10:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Baqara[edit]

Please don't drop in a huge chunk of foreign language text into an article as you did here. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's necessary here.Ziyaurr (talk)

No, it's not. It means nothing to English language readers. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not only for English readers but for whole. It's for better understanding. Ziyaurr (talk)

No, this is the English language Wikipedia. Content needs to be in English. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:40, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To understand better we need to know the Arabic text. Because, the subject is about that Arabic text. And, for more understanding I'll add the meaning for the text in English. Thanks Ziyaurr (talk)

Again, English readers will have zero use for scrolling through a mass of foreign language text. And any translation must come from reliable sources. It cannot be your own interpretation. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll mention reference. Ziyaurr (talk)

If you're thinking of adding in the whole thing, please don't. That sort of thing belongs at Wikisource. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 07:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with NeilN, Ziyaurr. I understand where you're coming from, but this is still the English Wikipedia. A link to Wikisource will do just as well. I have seen that in some other suras you added text and I will look at them; if they are accompanied by a reliably sourced translation, as NeilN suggest, that may be (more) acceptable. I think in general this is a good topic to start a conversation on; unfortunately, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Quran seems to be pretty inactive. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bible is a lot more lively, if only to indicate where most of our editors are coming from. :) As luck will have it, Alephb just started a conversation on a biblical topic that's related to yours. I do believe in general we need to figure out a. how to bring the articles on the suras up to standard and b. what to include or not to include. For instance, I saw that Matthew 7 has the full text, and I'm not sure I agree with that. But dropping in 100k of untranslated Arabic doesn't help anyone, really. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 19:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I already started to translate other Surahs (Al-Fatiha, Al-Nas) with reliable sources. Thanks! Ziyaurr (talk)

February 2017[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Al-Baqara.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Al-Falaq. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Ziyaurr/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Ziyaurr. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 17:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright notice[edit]

Your addition to Al-Masad has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. It appears that there are quite a few other articles with copying. This is a very serious infraction. Do not copy and paste into Wikipedia again. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:22, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I visited the website [ http://www.islamvision.org/b111.html ] you provided. Unfortunately, they have the same version of this work. Perhaps, they are using this work for it is a free to use material. This work is of Hafiz Khan, July 2011; San Jose, California USA Web Site: www.quranpda.com Email: quran@quranpda.com. You can visit his website. This work is also available @ http://www.quran-eic.com/assets/HTML/Tafheemul_Quran_Arb_Eng.html and some other websites.

You can read the Introduction section from http://www.quran-eic.com/assets/HTML/Tafheemul_Quran_Arb_Eng.html that this is a free to use work. User:Ziyaurr (talk)

The introduction states that the text that it is a translation of Tafhim-ul-Quran, which was written by Abul A'la Maududi (1903-1979) and likely first published in Pakistan. Under Pakistani law, literary works are copyrighted for fifty years after the death of the author,[1] which would be until 1979+50=2029. We would need to see a statement by Maududi (or the publisher that owns the copyright, if not him) that the work is freely usable. Also, what you call the "free to use" statement in the introduction ("There are no restrictions. This work is available free of cost. CDs can be made and distributed. Web sites can copy and redistribute without seeking any permission.") is insufficient for Wikipedia, even if the person putting this material online did have Maududi's blessing. Wikipedia requires a statement permitting modification and permitting commercial use. Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BeHafizh[edit]

The article BeHafizh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article on an unremarkable Quaran study aid app.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesG5 (talk) 08:15, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Quran for Android for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quran for Android is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quran for Android until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Insert CleverPhrase Here 09:41, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Quranic software[edit]

Hello Ziyaurr,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Quranic software for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Quranic software for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quranic software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quranic software until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ziyaurr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ziyaurr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Government Industrial Training Institute Coochbehar moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Government Industrial Training Institute Coochbehar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:27, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dhiya Ur-Rahman Azmi, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 17:42, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Government Industrial Training Institute Coochbehar[edit]

Hello, Ziyaurr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Government Industrial Training Institute Coochbehar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Government Industrial Training Institute Coochbehar[edit]

Hello, Ziyaurr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Government Industrial Training Institute Coochbehar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:32, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]