User talk:ToTeporetermerter56

April 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Fanfanboy. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Top News, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fanfanboy (talk) 16:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a zap from alexmusic.net from December 18, 2006 that Top News was going to be called "DigiNews", so it was a mistake, i'm so sorry! Forgive me! ToTeporetermerter56 (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All good mate. Just make sure to put a citation whenever adding content. Fanfanboy (talk) 18:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blean Turhani. Thank you. Fanfanboy (talk) 19:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Bekoshisht! I'm ToTeporetermerter56 from Fandom. I'm so sorry! ToTeporetermerter56 (talk) 19:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If my accusation is false, then don't worry, your account will likely not be blocked. For more info see this link that will tell you how to defend yourself, and other things. Fanfanboy (talk) 15:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I hope that i become an extended confirmed user here. I fix the misspellings on the Albanian Wikipedia. ToTeporetermerter56 (talk) 15:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 17:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry, unblock me! Bekoshishtsucks (Bekoshishtsucks talk) 19:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, everyone![edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ToTeporetermerter56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry everyone, unblock me!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.