User talk:Sjick14

SPI[edit]

This account is suspected of being a sockpuppet for an indef-blocked User:CaptainHog. As such, an sockpuppet investigation has been opened up here. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 15:23 on September 3, 2016 (UTC)

September 2016[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 15:55, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sjick14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You're gonna block me because you think I'm this one guy... Sjick14 (talk) 19:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes. Huon (talk) 19:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Who cares if this guy just keeps making multiple accounts? Shouldn't all that matter is that he's trying his best?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sjick14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Before I continue with this, I want you to bear with me here. I don't believe I've specified my motive behind making multiple accounts. I tried using the further unblock thing, the one that takes 6 months, and I hear absolutely nothing back. At all. That's why I keep "abusing" multiple accounts. I wanna keep getting better at things and I can't get my CaptainHog account unblocked. Anyways, I'm sick of this shit. Can we be friends now? Sjick14 (talk) 00:33, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 01:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sjick14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Tell you what y'all, If you unblock me on this account, I'll stop abusing multiple accounts, I won't continue to "vandalize" (which I wasn't doing in the first place), and just try my absolute best to make positive contributions and we can all be civilized, mkay? And I MEAN IT this time. Sjick14 (talk) 03:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. Go back to your original account and comply with whatever conditions have been imposed there. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:36, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.