User talk:SV Resolution/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Redirecting your user page
I'm sorry but you can't actually redirect your user page outside Wikipedia. By all means write a link saying something like,
"I'm most active in wikibooks. See my user page there."
But you can't physically redirect, sorry. --Celestianpower hab | myRFA 15:59, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- yes - I would say so personally. --Celestianpower hab | myRFA 20:14, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
Lavandula x intermedia
Hello. I think such crossbreeds can easily be redirected without categorizing a single hint. De728631 (talk) 16:05, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well, redirecting to a redirect doesn't work, so I pointed both of them to Lavender. Maybe you could point out some specific features of L x intermedia in the main article? As you put it in a category for medicinal plants, maybe that section at Lavender is interesting. De728631 (talk) 16:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Hinckley Yachts
A tag has been placed on Hinckley Yachts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. justinfr (talk/contribs) 13:59, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
public demo of Swiftfuel
Now that is a nice thing to add. A few more of those and we might even have a notable and verifiable topic! Thanks. HatlessAtless (talk) 19:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment on my talk page. The truth is out there. Of course, it takes time to find it. --SV Resolution(Talk) 19:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- The truth may be out there, but I'd done some pretty good digging. I wouldn't have nominated it for deletion if I hadn't. I'm impressed with your research skills that you not only found something I hadn't, but you found something quite good. HatlessAtless (talk) 20:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Just goes to show that local newspapers like the Carroll County Comet are still relevent when the reporters keep covering those "boring" meetings. --SV Resolution(Talk) 20:20, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Help requested
Hi, I am a bit new here but I looked at the talk page for Keepcalmandcarryon and I need someone that can help calm him down a bit over on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame_controversy. Please have a look at the edit history and the talk page and give your opinion, thank you. Unomi (talk) 22:01, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Edit in your namespace
I understood that you proposed to work in you namespace. If not, obviously, feel fre to delete what you deem. Regarding Keep and Tom you can see by yourself as they are aggressive and not very fancy of wikilove. :-) --Calgaco (talk) 16:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
More info - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 18:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Re Great Work
Just wanted to let you know that I have been following your work, sorry for not being much a help thus far but I think you are doing a great job! :) Unomi (talk) 13:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm glad things are a bit calmer at Aspartame controversy, but wish there was some collegial back-and-forth to help advance the article. Once the drama dropped, the editors left. It's unfortunate. --SV Resolution(Talk) 14:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
No worries :)
It wasn't exactly obvious from the context, especially with it being a 1-2 line stub, so I can see how it happened. Orderinchaos 23:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Looks good, go ahead and redirect it, I don't think anyone will mind. Good job!--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 04:39, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. Someone at Barlow knife did not agree with my earlier attempt. Let's see if they'll reconsider if I follow procedure this time. --SV Resolution(Talk) 14:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Don't leave me!
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For being grounded in science but not close-minded, particularly in the approach to the aspartame controversy article. II | (t - c) 16:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC) |
Where the heck are you going? I thought we had some good collaboration going on, and Wikipedia needs people like you. II | (t - c) 16:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of University of the poor
The article University of the poor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
University of the poor – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (talk) 20:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jamesdean3295
Yes indeed I was trying to respond to a posting on my talkpage. This user seems to have signed by typing Jamesdean3295.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 07:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
GA reassessment of Vitamin C
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Vitamin C/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
since you comment in new utopia maybe you know ?
hi did look up new utopia on internet for weeks but did not find much new things so you was in the new utopia article but suddenly quiet in the discussion page any idea what happened to new utopia ?
the offical website did say that in did start construction now maybe it should be update the wikipeida artickel but at the same time it need to update its pasport infomation... the links have not been updated too
maybe its should be added in the wiki artick?
mayeb the ppl just move on the seasted things or made a gaeted comunity in aruba or brazil or brunei and kept what was left og the project ? forgot the whole thing moved on to get a green card to sinagpore or dubai ...
a intresting thing was that the laws made for trust and banks and companys in new utopia look like a are taken from somwhere else becuse it dont look like its written in uk or usa enghlis...
l
i allso found by look up new utopia citizenship or shomthing like that a investment bank in antigua get closed becuse of fraud was used to transfer fees and money by the new utopia project...
one of the owner of the domain name was made bankrupt in florida fort meyers court
if it get sued for fraud in florida why did the charte citizens get ther office in caymen island (that showes in the youtube video )now when caymen island can give infomation abut amricans convicted of crime ?
when many of the cariben island did give clients lists the last 5 years why did not charter citise get there mony back (if it is a fraud) becuse look like many of them(investoer/conslats/govounoers have mony offshore?
got sued ? what happen to charter citizens? Investors’ did sue them for fraud and made the project somewhere else ? because all the business /project did stop in 2007/2008 and the site did move to flordia then to uk (just look it the dictionary that was the domain name )
sorry for my bad enghlis
murakami — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.147.33.187 (talk) 16:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, SV Resolution. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)