User talk:MetabolicMadness

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MetabolicMadness, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi MetabolicMadness! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi MetabolicMadness! You created a thread called Need an experienced eye at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Your edits[edit]

It seems possible from your edits that you have some connection to the subject of low carb diets, possibly as an author of one of the papers you cite. That's fine, but it constitutes a conflict of interest and needs to be declared. Guy (Help!) 09:48, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI[edit]

I have no connection to this paper or its authors as published in the British Medical Journal. I did become aware of it about a year ago because one of the author's tweeted it. I have no COI to declare. All my edits are factual and add to the currency or correctness of the article. I suggest that you focus on the correctness of the edits I made. For instance the review paper was dated asof 2018. That is incorrect as it was submitted in May 2017, accepted in June and published in 2017. The Zinn paper addresses the micronutrient sufficiency of the LC diet and was submitted July 2017 and published in 2018 so could not have been included. It's unlikely anyone will choose to add to the research base on this topic and I note no challenges to this paper despite a year and none should be expected because it's a straightforward matter for dietitians to put a diet plan and analyse that with nutritional software. ---- MetabolicMadness (talk) 10:29, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]