User talk:LinksWant2BeFree

Vandalism - warning test2[edit]

Please do not remove AfD tags without cause, or delete valid information to make a point. It is considered vandalism. If you wish to contest an AfD, please use proper procedures. Thank you. Ckatz^chat _spy 19:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "null" text in the header shouldn't have been there - it was a byproduct of the message script system. The above message now reads as it should. --Ckatz^chat _spy 20:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD? Please STFU! --LinksWant2BeFree 20:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Civility and consider this an official warning. Femto 20:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning[edit]

I think it's obvious enough that this account was created by User:Urod with the only purpose to continue the dispute with User:Requestion about external links at List of screen capture software.

This is your only warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did here, remove deletion tags, or disrupt to make a WP:POINT, you will be blocked.

Femto 12:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can assure you that I am not User:Urod, but just another person who happens to find User:Requestion an anally retentive, pedantic cocksmoker. --LinksWant2BeFree 20:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bye. Femto 21:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, chill out. After your message I did not change any pages, with the exception of my own talk page. What is your problem? Also, according to Wikipedia:Blocking policy, a permanent block is not really in order here. --LinksWant2BeFree 22:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock | Would it be ok if I remove the offending passages from my user page?}}

Doesn't change the fact that you wrote it. You've been indefinitely blocked as an abusive new account, for deliberate incivility after ignoring a final warning, simple enough. The block has already been reviewed, do not add another unblock tag. Femto 20:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello administrator. Please do not unblock this attack account. User:LinksWant2BeFree just wants to interfere with the open AfD again. BTW, I kind of like being called pedantic. (Requestion 19:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Heh, but unlike "cocksmoker", that title has to be earned around here. :p Femto 20:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock | If I wanted to mess with that AfD, I'd just use another proxy and create a new username. I want to use this account for something constructive. According to [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy]], a permanent block for an insult is excessive, so please reconsider.}}

That depends, in my mind, on a thing or two you don't seem to have addressed: if unblocked, would you abide by WP:CIV? Or, I don't know, apologize? – Luna Santin (talk) 09:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Another proxy" to mess with that AfD? You're trying to tell us something? - A permanent block is perfectly appropriate for an abusive account that didn't do anything constructive since its creation. Why would you want to keep this one anyway, except for unblock trolling? Stop abusing the unblock tags or your talkpage will be protected. Femto 13:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If unblocked I would follow WP:CIV from now on. Regarding the apologies, based on the actions of Requestion, I do genuinely feel that way about him/her. In hindsight though, I do think that it would have been better if I had kept that opinion to myself.

But the question is would you also follow WP:EL, WP:NOT, WP:SPAM, and WP:VAND? The AfD is now closed so you can't disrupt that anymore. Maybe you can be reformed. If you are released from wiki-jail what would you do with this account that is constructive? Please, I really want to know. I might even lobby for your parole if you can provide a good answer. (Requestion 19:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]