User talk:Keeley Dann

Please discuss at Talk:Emma Sinclair[edit]

Hi Keeley Dann, thanks for making a first step in starting a discussion, by talking to the other editors on their talk pages. However, individual users' talk pages are generally unsuitable for holding discussions about article content. They're more useful for discussing conduct issues (such as shown in the warnings above).

To discuss the article content, please start a discussion at Talk:Emma Sinclair. If you have a connection to the article subject, please disclose it there. Keep the discussion content-based; do not address editor conduct on the article's talk page. This helps to maintain a clear separation between conduct-related discussion on user talk pages, and content-related discussion on article talk pages.

The block does not prevent you from discussing the matter on the article's talk page, and it does not prevent you from choosing any of the recommended dispute resolution steps if the discussion comes to a standstill. It only prevents you from continuing to edit war, so I hope it's an agreeable temporary measure that can be lifted if the dispute has been settled.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~ ToBeFree Thank you for all your help. Keeley Dann (talk) 01:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Keeley Dann, of course.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

…I've seen the edits now, though, and I'd like to point to the conflict of interest guideline again. I've had hoped for a disclosure before further substantial edits happen. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:36, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stuart Heritage for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stuart Heritage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Heritage (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]