User talk:Jhargrov

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Jhargrov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! RayTalk 14:17, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will use the resource materials you suggest as the page about the Plateau Principle is developed. Jhargrov (talk) 14:48, 8 October 2009 (UTC)JamesJhargrov (talk) 14:48, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in WP:PHARM[edit]

You might like to look at WP:WikiProject Pharmacology, at the group's talk page. WikiProject Pharmacology is a group of editors that are interested in pharmacology. Anyone who is interested is welcome to join, to leave messages for other editors there, to ask questions or get advice, or to just say hello and tell people what you've been working on. If you're interested, you might like to put the group's page on your watchlist. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:20, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

William Lee Popham (American), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 20:22, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Nice article. I've cleaned up a few things that were done a little differently than our regular practice, and left a few more. One thing I did notice, you use a lot of in-text external links, which are generally discouraged. I've replaced many of them either with references (as in the Library of Congress case) or with direct wikilinks (where the target of the link was Wikipedia itself). I also tried to partially clean up the references. And, finally, the last paragraph starts drifting from what I'd call "encyclopedic tone", particularly since it's unreferenced, any sort of conclusion we draw should be something we don't initiate ourselves, but read directly from our sources. Those considerations aside, it was certainly good enough to promote to article space, and I've done so. Thank you! --j⚛e deckertalk 20:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eddie891 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eddie891 Talk Work 22:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Jhargrov, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eddie891 Talk Work 22:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Forbes[edit]

The article looks good, and so do your changes, you should just try and have a citation a paragraph-At least Eddie891 Talk Work 17:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Forbes and Company (Southeastern United States Indian traders), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Smmurphy(Talk) 20:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Jhargrov. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]