User talk:Jeff5001
Welcome![edit]
Hi Jeff5001! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! I dream of horses (t) (c) Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page 00:04, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
May 2020[edit]
Hello, I'm Killarnee. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Fisher Park High School—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 21:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 21:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fisher Park High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 21:46, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fisher Park High School, you may be blocked from editing. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 21:48, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fisher Park High School. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 23:05, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 23:48, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 02:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Jeff5001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, I am Jeff5001 and I believe I have been blocked unfairly and my content has been rolled back for no reason. For 15+ years I have been a researcher at Canada's National Research Council and I understand very well the importance of credible and factual sources. As such, I have been building the site Fisher Park High School using printed copies of year books and obituaries of staff etc. I have avoided opinion at all cost and have been trying to build up the history of the school using clear facts that cannot be disputed. I have put in significant effort to use reference material and cross referencing this with other sources and entering information on Wikipedia once the info has been verified. I strongly believe my edits were in good faith and provided valuable information for others. Additionally, many other high school sites have similar headings to what was removed. I have spent significant time ensuring all my references were listed using the correct format and from verifiable printed sources. I hope you will review this and agree with me. Thank you very much.
Decline reason:
If you are editing Wikipedia or performing research as part of your job duties, you need to declare as a paid editor. You used primary sources; Wikipedia is primarily interested in what independent reliable sources state about a subject, not what a subject says about itself(such as in a school yearbook). A list of teachers is not appropriate unless all those teachers merit Wikipedia articles(unlikely). I believe the block was correct, and I see no grounds to lift it, as such, I am declining your request. You may make another request, describing the edits you will make if unblocked, I suggest that you also review reliable sources beforehand. 331dot (talk) 08:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Jeff5001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sorry, when I mentioned my role at NRC I was not suggesting I am a paid editor. I simply meant I understand the importance of proper research and proper citations. I am not being paid to edit here. Having said that, I guess I assumed that a list of all staff throughout the years would be useful to others but if this is not the case I am now re-requesting an unblock and I will simply use my editing rights in the future to correct or add useful items, as I have been doing for many years before this week. Respectfully, Jeff5001
Accept reason:
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)