User talk:Democratic Backsliding

Democratic Backsliding, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Democratic Backsliding! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:02, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Beta uprising for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beta uprising is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beta uprising until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:29, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2017 purges in the United States[edit]

A tag has been placed on 2017 purges in the United States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JamesG5 (talk) 02:43, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Control-left[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Control-left should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Control-left .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

menaechmi (talk) 20:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Hi, I'm Jethro, an administrator. Some concerns have been brought up about your creation of articles such as Control-left and Beta uprising. Topics that are covered as articles here must satisfy some requirements. These include:

Articles cannot represent original research, meaning that personal observations or research on this topic can't be used as article content. It seems that some the articles you've created are novel terms that do not appear to be recognized or have use in credible sources.
Related to original research, you must avoid drawing novel conclusions based on claims made in reliable sources. This is called synthesis, and it's not appropriate content for Wikipedia articles. We have to stick to what the sources say, and not interpret or read further into them when writing article content.
Wikipedia is not a platform for advocacy of any kind. The pattern of articles you've created, along with your username, suggests you are here to push a political message, and you cannot persist in doing so.

You've been notified that many articles you've created have violated one of these guidelines (and others), so I'm going to ask you to stop creating articles that violate these expectations. I encourage you to consider creating working on articles outside of politics. I JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 00:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As Jethro notes, Wikipedia isn't a platform for advocacy, either for a given cause or for your personal interpretation. This extends to trying to popularize terms and concepts that you have coined yourself. Please provide evidence of significant coverage in major independent publications for all content, especially for neologisms. Acroterion (talk) 01:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry.--Democratic Backsliding (talk) 03:36, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Democratic backsliding, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 03:45, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs[edit]

An AfD tag is left on the article until the AfD is closed. This is explained on the AfD tag on Democratic backsliding Jim1138 (talk) 03:48, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SoundCloud rap for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SoundCloud rap is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoundCloud rap until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:23, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edgy (adjective) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edgy (adjective) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgy (adjective) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 19:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Antifa Civil War[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Antifa Civil War, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Home Lander (talk) 02:39, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Acroterion (talk) 02:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not distruptive editing, read the freaking Wikipedia policies dawg.--Democratic Backsliding (talk) 02:48, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow Wikipedia policy and stop making things up or posting rumors that you've seen in Internet forum chat. Acroterion (talk) 02:48, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert : post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding , a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Doug Weller talk 12:20, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eurielle[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Eurielle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Abishe (talk) 12:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of African Spring[edit]

A tag has been placed on African Spring requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- 🎼Yexstorm2001🎼 (talk) 05:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Democratic Backsliding/sandbox[edit]

User:Democratic Backsliding/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Democratic Backsliding/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Democratic Backsliding/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 23:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brittnie Upchurch[edit]

A tag has been placed on Brittnie Upchurch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SeraphWiki (talk) 01:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hyperinflation in Venezuela[edit]

Hello Democratic Backsliding,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hyperinflation in Venezuela for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 19:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Jess Manafort "Fake News"[edit]

Hi, you removed the descriptor of "foreign agent" from Jess Manafort's father, but he registered himself as a foreign agent. That's not fake news:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/former-trump-campaign-chairman-paul-manafort-files-as-foreign-agent-for-ukraine-work/2017/06/27/8322b6ac-5b7b-11e7-9fc6-c7ef4bc58d13_story.html?utm_term=.c126ee54bee4

It should be made clear in the article that it is not illegal then, or else it would be so misleading it would be considered fake news.--Democratic Backsliding (talk) 09:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2020s, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dark-World25 (talk) 06:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of SoundCloud rappers[edit]

The article List of SoundCloud rappers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 18:30, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Black Excellence[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Black Excellence, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Black Excellence[edit]

A tag has been placed on Black Excellence requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. –Ammarpad (talk) 08:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Black Excellence for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Excellence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Excellence until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Ammarpad (talk) 16:18, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

East Carolina University student riots moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, East Carolina University student riots, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 07:42, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:East Carolina University student riots[edit]

Draft:East Carolina University student riots, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:East Carolina University student riots and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:East Carolina University student riots during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Alexis Jazz (talk) 02:53, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of SoundCloud rappers[edit]

The article List of SoundCloud rappers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexis Jazz (talk) 03:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of SoundCloud rappers for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of SoundCloud rappers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of SoundCloud rappers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexis Jazz (talk) 03:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spygate[edit]

Hello Democratic Backsliding,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Spygate for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TomCat4680 (talk) 04:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two pages about one person[edit]

Please learn how to write a biography of a living person. Your texts are unsourced.Xx236 (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Xx236 (talk) 07:02, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just make one a redirect, I don't know which is better according to Wikipedia. Thanks for volunteering to do that.--Democratic Backsliding (talk) 07:04, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of P.J. Connelly[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, P.J. Connelly, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want P.J. Connelly to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Xx236 (talk) 07:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of P. J. Connelly[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, P. J. Connelly, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want P. J. Connelly to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Xx236 (talk) 07:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please quote reliable sources.Xx236 (talk) 08:14, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kandie Smith[edit]

A tag has been placed on Kandie Smith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melcous (talk) 07:52, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bobby Hanig[edit]

The article Bobby Hanig has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JC7V-constructive zone 20:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Democratic backsliding in the United States[edit]

A tag has been placed on Democratic backsliding in the United States, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mccapra (talk) 11:05, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited East Carolina University Student Government Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Da Baby[edit]

Hello Democratic Backsliding,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Da Baby for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 13:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Student Government at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill[edit]

A tag has been placed on Student Government at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DannyS712 (talk) 20:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics and to living or recently deceased people[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Note that these alerts normally need to be given ever year. Doug Weller talk 11:43, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion at Democratic backsliding[edit]

You deleted well sourced material with the edit summary " a known very politically left biased news organization". That's your personal opinion and not backed up by sources. It's described as liberal in its article. You clearly didn't check the source itself before deleting it, as it is an article written by academics, one being Tom Ginsburg, Leo Spitz Professor of International Law, Ludwig and Hilde Wolf Research Scholar at the University of Chicago Law School, one of the top law schools in the world. This was a sloppy revert and from your edit summary perhaps politically motivated, especially as you hardly ever use edit summaries. I note that your only edit to the article's talk page was to complain about an alleged anti-right wing slant, where I said I saw neither the slant or a mention of right-wing and User:Neutrality also saw no such slant and remove the pov tag you added, again without an edit summary.

Another reason I call it sloppy because part of the statement above it, which you didn't remove, was from exactly the same source.

Please be more careful in the future when deleting sourced text. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source was Vox, so I stand correct, and you stand corrected.--Democratic Backsliding (talk) 20:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed this. It doesn't make any sense as a reply to my comment. You shouldn't have removed it. If you are so sure you are correct, please take it to WP:RSN. Doug Weller talk 14:49, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't make any sense as reply to your comment? What does that mean?--Democratic Backsliding (talk) 20:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't notice this. Vox is considered a generally reliable source on Wikipedia and as I said the authors are clearly reliable. Your response still makes no sense although I guess it shows your views. Nevertheless you edit was wrong. Doug Weller talk 19:43, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Country trap moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Country trap, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arab Spring 2[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Arab Spring 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kb03 (talk) 13:15, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arab Spring 2.0[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Arab Spring 2.0 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kb03 (talk) 13:15, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of New Arab Spring[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on New Arab Spring requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kb03 (talk) 13:15, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at United Constitutional Patriots, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 North Carolina's 3rd congressional district special election, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Republican and Tim Harris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Democratic Backsliding[edit]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Democratic Backsliding, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:27, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Country trap[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Country trap".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 11:11, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Protests of 2019[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Kingsif and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Protests of 2019 for deletion, because it seems to be an article that has been already decided by a [decision] to be unsuitable for inclusion.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kingsif}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kingsif (talk) 22:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The link says bad title. --Democratic Backsliding (talk) 22:11, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Protests of 2019[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Kingsif and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Protests of 2019, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protests of 2019.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kingsif}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kingsif (talk) 00:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Protests of 2019, you may be blocked from editing. You have already been warned about the need to seek consensus for edits (or other actions) that could be controversial at Talk:Protests of 2019. Boud (talk) 21:15, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Global protests[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Kingsif and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Global protests, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kingsif}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kingsif (talk) 02:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding

Thank you for creating Virginia Citizens Defense League Lobby day.

User:I dream of horses, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|I dream of horses}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:53, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Virginia Citizens Defense League Lobby day moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, 2020 Virginia Citizens Defense League Lobby day, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:54, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Unite the Right rally, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 17:17, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was not disruptive, because my edits made the article more neutral and accurate. It was not a dispute because I was not involved in an active edit conflict with another editor.--Democratic Backsliding (talk) 02:33, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:03, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice about gun control articles[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | talk 19:15, 20 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alerts for post-1932 American politics and for living and recently decease people[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COVID-19 Outbreak Cases and deaths in the United States[edit]

--Democratic Backsliding (talk) 04:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2020 Virginia Citizens Defense League Lobby day[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2020 Virginia Citizens Defense League Lobby day".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:19, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Elizabeth City, North Carolina. Sundayclose (talk) 15:58, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dog coin moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Dog coin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 06:20, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles[edit]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Shiba Inu (cryptocurrency), Meme coin and Dogecoin. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dog coin[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dog coin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dog coin[edit]

Hello, Democratic Backsliding. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dog coin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]