Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Notcharizard was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
"Details about Pastor Miguel's early life are not publicly documented" then he fails notability for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rev. Miguel Bustillos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Deliversyou!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- NotCharizard🗨 04:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miguel Bustillos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
You don't think being a Kentucky Colonel enough is not notable? Deliversyou (talk) 14:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That the highest commission given by the state of Kentucky to a civilian? That like being an ambassador from Kentucky. This man is a well know exorcist. Deliversyou (talk) 14:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You failed to provide inline citations which is a hard requirement for biographies. Your sources also are not independent, so it fails the WP:NBASIC criteria.
The Kentucky Colonel might make him notable, but since you did not bother to cite this we cannot verify it. Qcne(talk) 14:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They don't list members (The Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels), however, we do have his certificate that we would be happy to provide a copy. In Wikipedia there are many who are Kentucky Colonels that you list. Click here to see Pastor Miguel Bustillos as a kentucky colonel: https://www.deliverancexorcisms.com/blog-and-ministry-news/pastor-miguel-bustillos-commissioned-as-kentucky-colonel for citations inline we provided by numbers. Independent sources were provided by Diane Calabrese which is an independent author. In addition to that this man is a well known author in his niche field. I am sure if he was a catholic priest he would have been included. Under the exorcism reference on Wikipedia, you have listed over 20 priest as exorcist, some of them are not even known. No references are provided for them, but you included them. I ask that you reconsider. Thank you Deliversyou (talk) 14:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sources must be published, so I am afraid a certificate is not a valid source unless it can be accessed from a library.
deliverancexorcisms is not an independent source. We must have an independent source to verify this information. I could proclaim myself the King of England on my own personal website- that does not make it true.
You failed to properly format your in-line citations, the tutorial is at WP:INTREFVE.
It sounds like you have a connection to this person and/or the organisation, as such it is mandatory to disclose this otherwise you would be in breach of the Wikimedia Terms and Conditions. The relevant guidelines are at WP:COI and WP:PAID.
This has nothing to do with the religious affiliation of the person: it is wholly to do with our notability, verification, and referencing policies. Do not make assumptions about my reviewing biases.
You stated Under the exorcism reference on Wikipedia, you have listed over 20 priest as exorcist, some of them are not even known. No references are provided for them, but you included them.. Please link to any relevant articles that have poor references and I will take a look. Wikipedia has millions of articles and is a purely volunteer project.
Let me know if you have any questions. Qcne(talk) 14:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
