User talk:Daulakh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2008[edit]

Hi Daulakh... I have provided enough evidences on KPS Gill's case, If you have any doubts on Amnesty International's Reports or on rest of the references then please talk, but please do not suppress the truth. Please go through the provided references first. I have not deleted any of the information, I have simply added more alongwith references. This is Wikipedia and I beleive that I have the same rights as you. So with due respect, it is my humble request that please do not delete the information which I have added recently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singh6 (talkcontribs) 20:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Singh6,

Please do not use this as a platform to promote Pakistan supported terror groups. The real enemy of Khalistan is not outsiders but people who bring bad name to the movement by using terror tactics to satisfy the spy agencies in Pakistan.

Hi Daulakh,

I am not promoting any specific group. I am as much Indian as you are. And, I am unable to support your thinking either. I do not hate any body. I simple love truth, either its against your thinking or against my idiology.

Regarding General Labh Singh's Bio, Thanks for changing the main page cover from General.... to his actual name. Actually, I tried doing it but since I am very new to this community, hence I could not find any way out to change the main bio.. name. I will go through your changes once I get time and I will correct them if required. I will post the reasons under discussion pages for your kind view so that rest of the readers could conclude as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singh6 (talkcontribs) 21:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Harjinder Singh Jinda, I do not feel it right to remove a persons early life from his own biography. Regarding decision of the Shiromani Akali Dal, the SHSAD, the SGPC, the Damdami Taksal, AISSF and the Dal Khalsa to honour him, I have got nothing to do with it. I simply beleive that it was a historical event because all these major parties jointly participated in his death anniversary where he was awarded with a certain honour hence it should stay in the article.

I could not understand that why you had to remove information about his early life. Is it just because you hate him, or you want to suppress their names at all.

Regarding their letter to the President of India, I have not added this text, and I agree with you to remove this lengthy letter. I have removed it and I have added a reference link instead.

Because of all these reasons I am going to revert it to its March 30th 2008 version but with removal of lengthy letter as you desired.Singh6 (talk) 22:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Khalistani Groups has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 01:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Khalistani Groups constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 01:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

This is not vandalism, I guess you are trying to deny the facts - Most organizations listed there are designated as terror outfits by EU, US and other countries. Are you a supporter of terror outfits like Al-Qaeda etc?

Look, this is an encyclopedia, so even articles about terrorist groups have to adhere to WP:NPOV. I think that there should be an exception, but nothing has come of my thoughts on this, so I have to abide by the decision, and that is why I reverted your edits. J.delanoygabsadds 01:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Babbar Khalsa is listed as a terrorist organisation by the United Kingdom,[1] the EU,[2] Canada,[3] India, and the United States. The edits were made on solid facts and not based on claims from unknown groups

I believe you, but unfortunately we still have to call them militant groups not terrorist groups. Also, if you want to leave me a message, go to my talk page and click the "+" next to "edit this page" J.delanoygabsadds 01:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me why we have to call militant groups? Kindly read the definition of terrorist organizations on wikipedia. It is clearly stated which is a terror organization and which is not. Feel free to ask me if you need any official proof. I am actively coordinating with some government organizations to make sure terrorist sympathizers do not vandalize and spread disinformation on the web