User talk:Chase me dinosaurs, I'm an insect

Welcome!

Hello, Chase me dinosaurs, I'm an insect, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:56, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No harm intended. I just have to keep track of everyone imitiating me! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Chase me dinosaurs, I'm an insect. You have new messages at Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry's talk page.
Message added 05:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Okay, I'll bite :)[edit]

What a curious name. What does it mean? I was unaware that dinosaurs possessed a predilection for chasing insects. If that is what you are, why would dinosaurs want to chase you? Women, for example, are often (for reasons of evolutionary psychology and all that sort of thing) inclined to chase the cavalry. What makes dinosaurs want to chase insects? Perplexedly yours, WikiDao ☯ (talk) 05:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest "Chase me dinosaurs, I"m a mammel". It's true from both perspectives. Buggie111 (talk) 14:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely for blatant disruption. (blocked by –MuZemike 02:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

The SPI[edit]

Ok, if you want to attempt getting Bugs and the other two accounts checked, the place to do that is a separate SPI case. This particular one is to investigate the allegations by other editors that the currently listed accounts are related. File a separate case to have your allegations checked, presenting your evidence for them. Just some advice, because you aren't going to make any headway trying to force it in the current case. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 02:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chase me dinosaurs, I'm an insect (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock. Baseball Bugs is accused of sockpuppetry. I only saw the report and reported it. Immediately people reported me as a sock. Then Baseball Bugs added a name to the SPI report but when I did, Bugs' friend, Grsz11 took it off. With no warning, I am blocked for life. Please unblock and I will exercise restraint. Please do it now. Thank you. I have always kept my word. If unblocked, I will remain polite and will allow people to attack me with little or no response. That is being very kind. I see the above Ks0stm advice and will abide by it in not adding Bugs name. In fact, I might even let Bugs, Transhumanist, and Princess go because I don't give a ___ about them, was just reporting what I saw. Please.

Decline reason:

Baseball Bugs is not the one being accused of sockpuppetry, you are. You cannot just add suspected sockpuppets to an SPI case about you. When you cause the disruption you caused, there is no need for warnings. The obvious sockpuppetry by you and the "new users" who commented at the SPI case make this unblock request easy to decline. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:06, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This may go without saying, but I urge admins to decline this unblock. The sum total of 'evidence' for either Bugs or the Transhumanist being socks is the following statement: "My main accounts are Baseball Bugs and The Transhumanist. This is a secret. Do not tell anyone or "out" me." Anyone who pretends to believe that this is evidence of sockpuppetry is either wholly incompetent to edit Wikipedia, or is--obviously--a trollsock themselves. → ROUX ₪ 03:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you saw a statement "I'm going to kill myself after signing off Wikipedia", you would or should call the police not ignore it. Likewise, I saw a statement and reported it. Both times are likely to be false but you report all suspected crimes.

None the less, blocking forever is way too harsh and please unblock and I will let people trample over me in the socks/Bugs issue and not edit about this. Ok? Chase me dinosaurs, I'm an insect (talk) 03:08, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Those are entirely different situations, and you know it. Here's a suggestion... why don't you admit who you're a sock of (and any other socks you have laying around) before the CU information gets posted? → ROUX ₪ 03:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chase me dinosaurs, I'm an insect (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry. Please let Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavary know about this. Please accept my apologies and I will try to be smarter next time. Please do not be so mean to me. Please note that Eagle 24/7 who declined unblock said that Baseball Bugs in not accused of sockpuppetry. This is completely false and shows that Eagle 24/7 is unaware of the situation. Bug's being a sock was the start of the whole thing. But I will let all of this Bugs stuff go. Please just unblock me. Besides unblock would just correct a mistake of Eagle, who didn't read the situation closely enough. I am sorry and ask that you not be so harsh.

Decline reason:

Does not seem to understand or acknowledge original reason for block: disruptive editing. Or state how user will improve behavior pattern in the future. -- Cirt (talk) 09:09, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Um, no, I looked at all of your edits, as well as the history of the SPI case page. Belittling an admin's decline reason will not get you unblocked. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let's just wait for the checkuser evidence, ok? NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 03:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked at all of this account's edits this year, and also at other edits arising out of this accounts activities (e.g. the SPI). There is far more than enough disruptive editing to justify maintaining an indefinite block, with or without checkuser evidence. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do this one small thing[edit]

Please don't be mean, please notify Chase me ladies, I'm the Calvery (see my contributions page for a link to his talk page as I wrote to him the other day). That is all I ask.

I am sorry. Please don't block me forever. My understanding is that I am blocked for life for the sockpuppetry policy means I cannot create another account. This is very harsh. I promise to be good. Chase me dinosaurs, I'm an insect (talk) 13:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ALSO BE STOP LEAVING COMMENTS> YOU CAN EMAIL ME. Chase me dinosaurs, I'm an insect (talk) 13:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You weren't blocked for sockpuppetry, you were blocked for disruption, which you've already been told several times now. As far as e-mailing, the last thing most of us would want is for you to have our e-mail addresses. However, if the user "Chase me ladies, I'm the CAVALRY" (not "Calvery", which suggests the place where Jesus was crucified) has his e-mail activated [which he does], you could theoretically send him a note and see if he feels like answering. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 14:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About the only way you could do yourself a favor here, if you honestly care to, would be to follow Roux's suggestion and list every registered account and every IP address you've ever edited under. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 14:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're not going to tell us who you're a sock of, we'll wait for the CU and revoke your talk page access in the meantime. This bantering is a waste of time. /ƒETCH COMMS / 15:08, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]