Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Spinster300 were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sharon E. J. Gerstel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, I have added all of the citations. Please let me know what exactly I need to change. Thank you! Ambermous (talk) 17:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ambermous!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 22:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mdann52 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
I've reviewed the article. There are a few key issues that need sorting before this can be accepted:
- List of publications needs trimming down considerably. Maybe to a few key ones that have received other coverage. Wikipedia convention is not to list every single publication in a biography. We also shouldn't be linking to Google Books/YouTube etc in the sections. I've removed the podcasts completely as these are just YouTube links.
- I'm not sure the sourcing quite establishes notability. I'm disreguarding source 3 as that's an oral history project, not coverage. the coverage in regards to the sounds project is useful, and [1] may also assist. I think a few more sources would establish notability, but I'm struggling to find any more coverage (it may well be in Greek, given the topic of study, which would assist here still)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sharon E. J. Gerstel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thank you so much. I have added additional sources, removed the google books links and also have removed some of the publications. Re: the photo, I received the image from the author and there is no copyright issue nor need for any special permission, since it was given by her. Please let me know if I need to do anything else. I am sorry if I am having a hard time with it, I am just unfamiliar with the process. Ambermous (talk) 16:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
