User talk:Adrian J. Hunter/Archive4

Re: Welcome

Thank you for the welcome! SniffCoke (talk) 20:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Welcome

Thanks for your warm greetings :) First and foremost, I'm determined to continue expanding Polish version of the project. Nevertheless, I keep revising articles from my areas of interest. At this moment, my contribution would rather not go beyond submitting some minor caveats :) Lb.at.wiki (talk) 07:37, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

DNA methylation

Title added, moved to bottom Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)}

Thanks for the welcome note, Adrian! I hope to branch out and in time contribute to other molecular biology/genetics related articles. Right now I'm reading lots of papers on DNA methylation so it seemed like a good place to start! --Sbabovic (talk) 19:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Checking in

Title added –Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)}

Hello, it is nice to have the opportunity to talk to you. Just checking in, nothing much to report, except that I have been elected as a WikiAnswer Premier Contributor. I'll continue per your suggestions. ~ Betaclamp (talk) 23:52, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

re Dna clamp

I just reread the article. I have often wondered about this, your profile shows me that you can answer this: the Entity-betaclamp is/was well defined. It has not been demonstrated that there are any types of Dna clamps OTHER THAN betaclamp! In other words, will you name any or all Dna clamps other than betaclamp? Best regards and much obliged. ~ Betaclamp (talk) 05:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

How was last Winter? Getting set-up for Spring?

I have some information. [Your]first: I wrote, near the top of the Article "betaclamp" {wherein I compressed Mr. B. Lewin's compressions} that betaclamp was a dimer in prokaryotes and a trimer in eukaryotes. Indeed, the result of the Merge that made it worthwhile and pleased me much was the appearance of the wonderful 'pictographs' -the dimer and trimer- 'beside' each other - I had wondered how to get this done & then it happened.

Next, PCNA. Yikes I just noticed that the trimer pictograph is labelled PCNA. This should be betaclamp;maybe, this msg is struggling to keep up with the updates! (See next line pls)

B. Lewin Genes VI gave six pages of Dna Pol III and betaclamp. {Note that mention made re Dna Pol delta and PCNA was only just very recently found, see last pls.}

Genes VI gives just two CURSORY mentions of PCNA. One in reference to SV 40 virus and PCNA as a 'processivity enhancing adjunct' to Dna Polymerase delta; and a shorter reference, re cell cycle and growth regulation = " ...cdk-cyclin dimers are usually found in the form of quaternary complexes that contain two further components. One is PCNA, a component of Dna polymerase delta, which may provide a connection with Dna replication. The other is the inhibitor p21."

One paragraph references the Dna polymerases alpha, beta, delta, epsilon and gamma. Then a graph label identified Dna Pol delta and Dna pol III as being the same entity. The reason for the name change is that when discussing Dna pol III, its subunits are labelled alpha, beta, delta, etc.; and I was about to conclude with "PCNA is beta clamp" , when I happened upon page 490 that includes under the topic "Initiation at the SV40 origin..." the use of terms Dna pol delta and PCNA. I'll need to review this and Yikes! this info is on the last half of the sixth page of the six mentioned above. 3 long paragraphs more & we'll have the Answer. ~ Betaclamp (talk) 07:45, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello Adrian, just a note to thank you for your correspondence, not late, not as late as this reply. The examination of the text [3 long paragraphs more] I have yet to do. Please be to be standing-by. ~ Betaclamp (talk) 02:39, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello Adrian, just a note to say that many advantageous editorial changes have been made by Boghog to both Dna clamp and Betaclamp-Sandbox. Your input as regards the outcome of these 'events' is anticipated. ~ Betaclamp (talk) 07:27, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive invitation

There are currently 2,745 articles in the backlog. You can help us! Join the September 2010 drive today!

The Guild of Copy-Editors – September 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive The Wikipedia Guild of Copy-Editors invite you to participate in the September 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive will begin on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on 30 September at 23:59 (UTC). The goals for this drive are to eliminate 2008 from the queue and to reduce the backlog to fewer than 5,000 articles. Sign-up has already begun at the September drive page, and will be open throughout the drive. If you have any questions or concerns, please leave a message on the drive's talk page. Before you begin copy-editing, please carefully read the instructions on the main drive page. Please make sure that you know how to copy-edit, and be familiar with the Wikipedia Manual of Style. Awards and barnstars A range of barnstars will be awarded to active participants. Some are exclusive to GoCE drives. More information on awards can be found on the main drive page. Thank you; we look forward to meeting you on the drive! — ɳorɑfʈ Talk! and S Masters (talk).

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 23:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC).

Thanks!

Hi, I just wanted to thank you for going over the Genetic Code→Effect of mutations. I think it's fair to say that this section of the article is much better now thanks to us. Good work Adrian! P.S. if you get a chance, feel free to improve the sources... hehe, thanks again! КĐ^♥ 19:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

After reading through Mutant and Mutation, I have to agree with you. I'll put in some thought and try to help, but I am inexperienced at merging articles so it will be a learning curve for me! КĐ^♥ 14:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

HTML e-mail link deletion

I thought that the link I added to the HTML e-mail article was a very useful update (most of the external links are historical and rather dated). I was surprised to find that it was removed on April 2nd. LittleBen (talk) 06:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Schmuck

No, you have well done. :-)

The dirctionary gives me neat, pretty, (smart), spruce, tidy.

In Neat it is mostly "5. Having a simple elegance or style; clean, trim, tidy, tasteful." (clothes, things, apartment, house) but also underline "Clean, tidy; free from dirt or impurities." (apartment, house) and as second "6. Well-executed; skilful [aesthetic], (precise)." The ethymology "from Latin nitidus (“gleaming”), from niteō (“I shine”)." sounds good.

It is an old word, today not often used as adjective. In today English, i think the most common word is pretty. --Franz (Fg68at) de:Talk 12:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

USDA sweeteners graph

Hi Vossman, and nice job on File:Usda sweeteners.svg.

Just one little thing: would you be able to change "glucose" to "glucose syrup", as per the source? I noticed the problem because the graph currently has separate lines for dextrose and glucose, which have the same meaning in the context of sweeteners. Glucose syrup has a different meaning to glucose. I'd fix it myself but I've never worked with a .svg.

Cheers,

Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 10:31, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

I will try to get around to it soon. SVG are really simple text files. If you open the file in a text editor, you *should* be able to edit the text directly. But because Wikipedia has issues with SVG files I had to convert all the text to lines and it cannot be edited. --vossman (talk) 17:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Polly Plummer etc

Thank you for fixing the titling of the article. However it appears I went with the wrong source for the spelling. Yes its spelled with two M's a lot, but her sister's article (which I though was a WP omission) was found (blanked by the mass blanking effort) spelled with one M, backed up by Sports Reference. So the original name was, in fact, correct. I've fixed the article. Trackinfo (talk) 20:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion

GOCE September 2010 backlog elimination drive progress graphs Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors September 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks to all who participated! Several of our top editors were called away to real life concerns during the month (be careful out there, people!). This meant that once again, we did not meet all our lofty targets, but we did come close. Stats Out of 76 registered editors, 45 actively participated. We nearly wiped out the 2008 articles from the backlog—there were only 13 remaining when the drive closed. We reduced the backlog by 725 articles (11.5%), so it was another successful drive. A total of 59 barnstars will be awarded to 40 editors—well done, and congratulations to all. Barnstars If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you edited in the July 2010 GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive, you may have earned rollover words, which counted towards this month's barnstars (except for the leaderboard awards). Any unused word credits will be held over for the next drive, as long as you participated in the September drive. Over the course of the next week or two, we will be handing out the barnstars. Click here to see a list of barnstar winners. We will be holding our next drive in November. You can sign up here. A huge "thank you" to all editors who helped clear the backlog and to others who helped out behind-the-scenes. See you at the next drive, and until then, please continue to help us work through the backlog. Happy editing! Coordinator: ɳorɑfʈ Talk! Co-coordinators: Diannaa (Talk) and S Masters (talk). Newsletter by Diannaa (Talk) and The UtahraptorTalk to me/Contributions.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 07:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC).

Metastability

Hi, Adrian. I put an "Inadequate lead" tag on the page Metastability and wrote on the talk page that it is entirely to be rewritten. If you have a look at it and at its history page you will understand what I mean by "inadequate" and why I want to change the lead section with its version before february 2010. Nobody has objected on the talk page in a week, so I think I will copy and paste the old lead deleting the existing one. My question is: since I have no rollback rights, is it correct for me to make this? Also, I warn you: W. again active! --GianniG46 (talk) 23:59, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Household Income Question

Hi Adrian. The table on household income comes from two sources; the OECD one you had, and also from Luxemborg Income Study. There is no discrepancy between what those sources say and what I put in the table. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lneal001 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Re:Ripchip Bot

Hi Adrian,

The two bots are right, Adrian. Have a difference between both articles. One (removed by XZeroBot) have a ´ above the -. in the "o". The second article (included by my baby) don't have that ´. Only the second one have article, and by the taxobox and picture, are the same animal. But thanks for advice me, and if you see Ripchip doing anything "strange", please let me know (in pt.wiki or IRC).

Changing the subject: You study environment? Or microbiology? I'm asking because of that.

Best regards, Béria Lima ^msg 10:58, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Peregrine Falcon

Adrian J. Hunter: I notice your insistence on reverting F. peregrinus' edits. You say it is "one of the fastest" creatures.

My logic is as follows: I can find no faster creature and thus call it the fastest extant member of the known animal kingdom. Is this not logically correct? If I can't find a taller structure in NY than the Empire State, should I not call it the tallest building and not "one of the tallest." ? What I am saying is It is intuitively obvious that it is taller because everything else is shorter. Occupying the position of fastest or tallest is not something that requires "proof," how could you prove it except by virtue of everything else being shorter/slower? There is nothing intrinsic to having such a position, and thus nothing that requires validation. It is a relative statement.

You tell me the burden of proof is on me with respect to my claims. My proof is given above, in the purest form possible. Thank you Xabian40409 (talk) 01:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Adrian J. Hunter. You have new messages at Talk:Madagascar.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GOCE elections

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Elections are currently underway for our inaugural Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, Friday 1 December – 23:59 UTC, Tuesday 14 December. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are six candidates vying for four positions. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:07, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

82.219.197.42

Hiya. When reverting a sequence of vandalism like the one from 82.219.197.42, you can be more aggressive about warnings, or just go straight to WP:AIV. There's no need to AGF when someone has pissed on the 'pedia fifteen times in half an hour! - Pointillist (talk) 01:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the help on the Dumbo article. It looks good. Didn't expect such a quick response from anyone. :) 98.166.111.32 (talk) 06:21, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: December 2010

In regards to my edit on the article Animal sexual behaviour, I was correcting the article. The reason being that the article made certain claims without proper citations.

All I did was make the article more accurate. I read the article that the former editor used, it had claims but no scientific evidence. http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/20718.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pankrato (talk • contribs) 02:53, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

List of children of the Presidents of the United States

All of the removed data needed to be there. I assume this edit was an accident? <( User:Couch on his Head and Smiling (talk) )> 03:39, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Year-end Report

Season's Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2010. Read all about these in the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report. Highlights Membership grows to 503 editors 2,589 articles removed through four Backlog elimination drives Our encounter with Jimbo Wales Guild home pages reorganized and redesigned Report on our inaugural elections Guild Plans for 2011 New barnstars introduced Requests page improved Sign up for the January 2011 Backlog elimination drive! Get your copy of the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report here On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. See you in 2011! – Your Coordinators: S Masters (lead), Diannaa, The Utahraptor, and Tea with toast.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:03, 31 December 2010 (UTC)