User talk:74.142.2.98

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Coleophora argentella. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Portal:Contents/History and events/Intro, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 20:02, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Portal:Society/Intro, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Portal:Society/Intro, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to My Fair Lady, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: My Fair Lady was changed by 74.142.2.98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924886 on 2012-03-15T16:56:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Society/Intro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 19:45, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Society/Intro, you may be blocked from editing. -- John of Reading (talk) 17:34, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Society/Featured biography/5, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. John of Reading (talk) 16:56, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one year for serious privacy-related issues. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:10, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm JohnBlackburne. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Portal:Mathematics/Categories because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 16:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Mathnet has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges in relation to information which has been removed from Wikipedia's public records.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en@wikimedia.org.

Administrators: Information which has been oversighted was considered when this block was placed. Therefore the Oversight team or the Arbitration Committee must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing oversight blocks without permission from an oversighter risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).
 -- A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.142.2.98 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

hope to be unblocked from Wikipedia soon....

  sorry for my disruption....
  People can write to me @ Attn:
  [details removed]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.142.2.98 (talk) 17:37, 10 July 2015‎

Decline reason:

Not sure if it makes sense to reactivate an unblock request months after it was posted. Also, we are absolutely not going to contact you, instead leave your rationale to be unblocked here. Max Semenik (talk) 17:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocking oversighter note: this IP appears to be remarkably static and, based on edits today and in the past, still belongs to the person on whom the oversight block was imposed. I don't see any evidence in this request that the user's behavior will change if he is unblocked. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]