User talk:219.100.37.240

February 2024[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I didn't do anything for block evasion. I just tried to communicate but not familiar with Wikipedia. But, Muboshgu was "incredibly" emotional and aggressive. 219.100.37.240 (talk) 03:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is the issue that leads you to constantly delete my posts? If you truly value fairness and transparency, please refrain from doing so. 219.100.37.240 (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not familiar with Wikipedia, and I had trouble locating the discussion page, which led me to repeatedly respond to users (Muboshgu and MaterialsPsych ) personally. While this may not be a problem for someone like you who is familiar with Wikipedia, it can be challenging for a beginner like me. Your lack of consideration for this and your emotional approach to this issue is a problem.

You claim my text is 'incredibly biased', but I just wrote the facts. 'Amy Klobuchar's tenure as Hennepin County Attorney has been marred by controversial cases ... Despite her role as lead prosecutor, evidence suggests that Klobuchar failed to ensure fair trials ... From the questionable tactics employed by her office to secure a conviction, to the failure to consider the validity of evidence, Klobuchar's handling of Haynes' case raises serious concerns about her commitment to justice.' Where exactly in this is not factual and is biased? She has not even apologized to the victim. Your use of the term 'incredibly' itself shows that you are approaching this issue with a biased perspective and emotionally.

However, if this is the issue, I will revise it to a neutral expression.

In addition, I clearly wrote in the discussion that I include the reference in the second and the third edits after I learned how to include references. That's why I couldn't include citation in the first edit that "MaterialsPsych" wrote that I violated a copyright.

So, You all are willing to abandon, block, and silence users who are not familiar with editing Wikipedia, just because you are accustomed to it. You handle things dictatorially, based on your emotions and your biases.

Reflect on whether this aligns with the spirit of Wikipedia or if you, as the ones in power, have become no different from the monsters you criticize and despise. 219.100.37.240 (talk) 04:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the above "a neutral expression" means "what you think" a neutral. 219.100.37.240 (talk) 04:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

219.100.37.240 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wrote a polite protest, but it was soon deleted. All my opinions were ignored, and anything that didn't align with their thoughts or feelings was deleted. I had no place to voice my thoughts. So, I wanted to leave a response even through a VPN, but it didn't work. I didn't even know if that was a problem. I just tried to communicate because there was no way to communicate. :I am not familiar with Wikipedia, and I had trouble locating the discussion page, which led me to repeatedly respond to users (Muboshgu and MaterialsPsych) personally. While this may not be a problem for someone like those who are familiar with Wikipedia, it can be challenging for a beginner like me. But Myboshgu's lack of consideration for this and your emotional approach to this issue is a problem. :Muboshgu claims my text is 'incredibly biased', but I just wrote the facts. 'Amy Klobuchar's tenure as Hennepin County Attorney has been marred by controversial cases ... Despite her role as lead prosecutor, evidence suggests that Klobuchar failed to ensure fair trials ... From the questionable tactics employed by her office to secure a conviction, to the failure to consider the validity of evidence, Klobuchar's handling of Haynes' case raises serious concerns about her commitment to justice.' Where exactly in this is not factual and is biased? She has not even apologized to the victim. But, to me, Muboshgu's use of the term 'incredibly' itself shows that Muboshgu is approaching this issue with a biased perspective and emotionally. :However, if this is the issue, I'm willing to revise it but Muboshgu never gave me a chance to make corrections, nor did they provide any specific guidance on what parts they considered biased or incorrect. Muboshgu simply dismissed my input without any constructive feedback, which I believe is not conducive to a healthy discussion or the collaborative spirit of Wikipedia. I am open to constructive criticism and willing to make changes, but I need clear guidance on what should be revised. :In addition, I clearly wrote in the discussion that I include the reference in the second and the third edits after I learned how to include references. That's why I couldn't include citation in the first edit. But "MaterialsPsych" wrote that I violated a copyright. :So, You all are willing to abandon, block, and silence users who are not familiar with editing Wikipedia, just because you are accustomed to it. You handle things dictatorially, based on your emotions and your biases. :Reflect on whether this aligns with the spirit of Wikipedia or if you, as the ones in power, have become no different from the monsters you criticize and despise.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for block evasion, and as I just saw this on another IP's unblock request, I guess it's true. You were evading a block. 'And we block proxies on sight. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.