User talk:173.3.162.15

U.S. Centric Wikipedia can't help itself.

Discover what's genuinely America and American: https://www.loc.gov/resource/g3290.ct007308/

April 2023

Hello, I'm Dmartin969. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Demonyms for the United States have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. –DMartin 08:31, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

LOL The Truth is not constructive right? You guys much prefer to keep promoting lies.

"The United States is not America and America is not the United States, in any careful use of language."

--George L Fox (1925).School and University in the United States. The Journal of Education and School World 173.3.162.15 (talk) 08:34, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

That is one person's opinion. You are welcome to add it into the article if it is properly cited, and you follow the Manual of Style. Wikipedia is not here to be your soapbox. –DMartin 08:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

No buddy, not an opinion, it's a fact. And this is a map of what's genuinely America and American: https://www.loc.gov/resource/g3290.ct007308/

Furthermore, the English language can no more cause one to misrepresent the name America and term American than it can make one misrepresent the name Europe and term European. 173.3.162.15 (talk) 08:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Discover what's genuinely America and American.

(Copyright violation removed)

173.3.162.15 (talk) 08:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

LOL Wow you literally had my statement removed under the false argument that it violated a copyright. So it's not that you are ignorant but that you are intellectually dishonest. And don't want wikipedia readers to be exposed to the obvious truth of what is genuinely America and American. Like I said before, wikipedia is a U.S. centric platform that promotes lies. 173.3.162.15 (talk) 11:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

For other editors, this is what is being censored as copyright violations, my own words. That's how much intellectual integrity exists in this forum.

(Copyright violation removed)

173.3.162.15 (talk) 11:26, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your edit to talk:173.3.162.15 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. –DMartin 16:31, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

So my own words are copyright material? are you looking to get sued? 173.3.162.15 (talk) 17:07, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

would you like to go in front of judge and explain how my words which I have posted numerous of times in social medias and have evidence as being my own express statements on the topic become wikipedia's copyright material? Or will just admit that failing to be able to rebut my statement you are resorting to this false claim in effort to censor information which you don't wish your audience expost? 173.3.162.15 (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. –DMartin 17:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

You know what is also prohibited!? Effective arguments, facts and statements debunking the nonsensical misconception that United States/United Statesians are one and same as America/Americans. Hence your dishonest excuse to censor information. And this platforms U.S. centrict intellectually dishonest campaign against the continent of America and what is genuinely American. 173.3.162.15 (talk) 18:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 17:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Lol Don't worry, there is no legal threat from my part. But keep me blocked for as long as you guys wish. Wikipedia has long discredit itself as nothing more than a garbage platform where U.S. centric popular ignorance, propaganda and misconceptions are promoted; And challenges to misinformation are censored. 173.3.162.15 (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

---