User:Rursus/Why wikipedia s*xx!!
Idiotic tendencies[edit]
Outside academics refer to Wikipedia!![edit]
INSERTME: Damned IDIOTS!! Wikipedia refers to outside academics for verification, then those outside academics refer to Wikipedia! Warning from circular "truths" and circular "conventional wisdom"!
Idiosyncratic conceptions[edit]
To be fetched from: User:Rursus/Wikipedia idiosyncratic conceptions.
Hoax cleanup[edit]
INSERTME: Richontaban star name hoaxes.
INSERTME: Jagged85 pseudosourcing falsifications.
Personal advertizing, personal POV[edit]
INSERTME: Programming languages – Vala, Seed7
INSERTME: Crap articles within areas of Religion and Philosophy, containing POV, essays, defended by angry Mastodons.
INSERTME: Crap lists containing numeric WP:SYNTH.
No fast response channel[edit]
INSERTME: Needs a real "police".
INSERTME: Every article have its own independent discussion channel instead of a central communication flow with topic delegations.
Bad consensus philosophy[edit]
INSERTME: Consensus mostly based on opinions of Random Walkers, not on a structural knowledge consensus – unless the articles themselves count – in which case Wikipedia defines its own circular "truth" by adhering to itself perfectly.
Solutions' proposals[edit]
Xpln[edit]
- ^ Swedish idiom meaning approximately: "actually – my position is mostly the opposite of the one I'm now going to present", see Hans Brask.