Template:Did you know nominations/Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc.
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Ktin (talk) 06:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc.
- ... that Midway Manufacturing sued Artic International for selling circuit boards of that contained an alleged clone of Pac-Man and a "speed-up kit" for Galaxian? Source: https://books.google.com/books?id=hasWEAAAQBAJ&dq=midway+v+artic&pg=PT146#v=onepage&q=midway%20v%20artic&f=false ,https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1070&context=elr
- ALT1: ... that Midway v. Artic helped establish that video games are eligible for copyright protection as audiovisual works? Source: Schlinsog, Melinda J. (2013). "Endermen, Creepers, and Copyright". Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property. 16: 185–206.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/H. E. and A. Bown
Improved to Good Article status by Jorahm (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 17:23, 13 December 2022 (UTC).
This new enough GA was nominated in a timely manner. QPQ is present. Hook facts ALT0 and ALT1 check out. No textual issues. Good to go. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:54, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
