Talk:Xobni

"It was founded in March 2157"?? Can someone please correct this?

Features?[edit]

This article states a lot about the company's funding, but next to nothing about the product's features. I think there's room for improvement here... -- IByte (talk) 08:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, only the above is an understatement. What does the software DO? After reading the article three times in a row, you find yourself still standing at square one: no idea. Perhaps those who wrote the article would stop for a moment and consider that portion of humanity that have not used the program, ever? Good! --AVM (talk) 21:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Xobni Insight plugs into Microsoft Outlook and offers fast search and people-based navigation of email archives." seems like all I need to know.—Kww(talk) 21:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gee, I'm amazed at how many geniuses are out there! "People-based navigation"? What the heck does that mean? What exactly are "email archives"? And so on. Sorry, I guess the standard (non-genius) user needs, and deserves, to know a lot more than that. The article is lacking, period. In other words: it sucks, period. --21:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

If you think *THIS* article sucks, you clearly haven't been reading Wikipedia long enough. ;-) Nameremoved82 (talk) 22:00, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

There's no lead, the EXT reviews should be either worked into article or cut, the Smartr products unbolded and copyedited/cut refs found, as it appears quite advertlike. Widefox; talk 16:03, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xobni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100115181548/http://www.businessweek.com:80/technology/content/mar2009/tc20090324_919313.htm? to http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2009/tc20090324_919313.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Xobni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi good day[edit]

Hi good day 102.89.33.13 (talk) 23:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]