Talk:Wilbur Scoville

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wilbur Scoville article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

United States Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

January 17 to 23, 2016 (11th)

Please Lock This Article[edit]

This article has been subject to numerous instances of vandalism due to today's Google doodle. It should probably be locked at least until the day ends. –Nahald (talk) 05:29, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be protected now. Paris1127 (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2016[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Why does an article about Scoville have an irrelevant discussion about anal sex? 172.15.8.199 (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The material appears to have been added by vandals and has been removed. Paris1127 (talk) 05:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2016[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Someone 'trolled' this article 203.177.56.99 (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed and protected. Paris1127 (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2016[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

123.201.42.242 (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC) There's wrong content in the second half pls rectify.[reply]

Fixed and protected. Paris1127 (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2016[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

The page has illicit content...not at all related to Wilbur... Please verify and rectify it...

122.15.20.34 (talk) 05:44, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed and protected. Paris1127 (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent vandalism[edit]

Probably this article should be protected again. Juan M. Gonzalez (talk) 10:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HE IS NOT BILL COSBY[edit]

This page has been vandalized and tuned into a Bill Cosby Page. How to Fix it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.52.240 (talk) 00:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Biography[edit]

For consistency, replace "piquancy" with "pungency" as was correctly linked in the first section. Seems odd to use the second word in the exact same context, and link, in the same article. SquashEngineer (talk) 15:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]