Talk:WKSK (AM)

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Radio Stations Low‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Question about signal strength[edit]

I recall the station's upgrade from 1kW to 5kW occurring when the station switched frequencies from 1600 kHz to 580 kHz. But the Business North Carolina article, published in 2002, indicates the jump to 5kW happened just a year earlier, which would have been 2001. I've not been able to find a history of station changes on the FCC's site. DL77 20:10, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On further reflection, the station's initial power must have been only 500 watts, and the initial jump in signal strength was to 1,000 watts. I definitely recall that the change from 1600 kHz to 580 kHz was due to the increase in watts. DL77 14:28, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WKSI logo.jpg[edit]

Image:WKSI logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 10:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]