This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
The EPE link gives 2MASS J00153675-1156172 (without the b) as an alias for the star, any references for the usage of "2MASS J00153675-1156172b" for the planet? Icalanise (talk) 15:21, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. A somewhat OR assumption by me, I suppose. :P --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
References section is fine.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
1a: In the lede, the orbital period sentence seem to split up a couple of sentences about the planets discovery. Would in be better elsewhere in the lede?
I've done plenty of re-arranging and a small add. How does it look? --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
1a: "searched the night sky for transits" is a bit lingo-ish. It's better to explain, which will probably involve splitting the sentence.
1a: "This notice came about" is a little odd. "This was discovered", maybe?
"This was discovered" didn't seem to fit quite right, so I tried something different. How does it look? --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:01, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
1a: I don't know what "the most honest solution" means.
I gave a clarification a shot. How does it look? --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
1b: The category "Hot Jupiters" is in the category "Gas Giants". Is there some reason this article should have both categories? If not, just keep the "Hot Jupiters" one. Similarly, should a planet be in the "Cetus constellation" category?
Well, it is in the Cetus constellation, so I'd say it should. I'll nix the Gas giant category momentarily.
2b: There's an accuracy tag in the "Other designations" section of the infobox, and discussion on the talk page about it.