This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
A fact from Victor Gardthausen appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 February 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
It would help those of us who are ignorant of palaeography to hear, briefly perhaps, how well his analyses from 135 years ago have stood up to more recent discoveries, datings and interpretations. What did he get right, what wrong? Probably much of this is at Palaeography but a summary here would be helpful.TSRL (talk) 22:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We are talking about edition from 1911-1913 (not 1879 - two volumes / one volume). This edition is often quoted by Metzger, Parker and other present scholars. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 22:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
