Talk:Trinity Western University v British Columbia College of Teachers

Canada: Law Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opinion of the court[edit]

I have removed this paragraph from the "Opinion of the Court" section:

The final analysis of the case, as reported by the Factum of the Intervener, the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, was that "In the circumstances of this case the Council of the B.C. College of Teachers failed to conduct such an inquiry and erroneously concluded that equality of rights on the basis of sexual orientation trump freedom of religion and association. They do not."

As best as I can tell (correct me if I missed it), this language does not appear anywhere in the decision of the Court. A position in the factum of an intervenor ≠ the opinion of the Court. Even where the Court came to a decision that the BCCLA urged it to make, that doesn't necessarily mean that the Court adopted all of the association's positions and/or arguments. The "Opinion of the Court" section of the article should stick to the actual text of the SCC decision, and not draw inferences from the submissions made to the Court.Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:47, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It does appear to be a direct quote from somewhere though. I have seen similar wording in the press recently as well. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:17, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It says it's a direct quote from the BCCLA factum. The media might even have reported it during oral arguments. That doesn't make it the opinion of the Court, though. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:44, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Trinity Western University v British Columbia College of Teachers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]