Talk:Symphony No. 2 (Ives)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Tempo#Mood markings with a tempo connotation|maestoso]] The anchor (#Mood markings with a tempo connotation) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Tempo#Mood markings with a tempo connotation|vivace]] The anchor (#Mood markings with a tempo connotation) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

"The direction 20th century music would eventually take" ![edit]

We have the following sentence:

Comparing Ives' 5th movement with Berio's 3rd movement one can compare the similarities in the quotation techniques, thus a testament to Ives' pointing to the direction that 20th century music would eventually take.

This is just silly (apart from the clunky prose - "comparing ... one can compare the similarities"). There is no such thing as "the direction that 20th century music would eventually take". 20th century music took many directions at many different times - many of them populated by only one or two composers. It is sad and absurd to try and cast Ives and Berio as "the eventual direction". Presumably, composers who did not have "similarities in the quotation techniques" are left out in the cold? --Tdent (talk) 11:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]