This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
steen's is NOT the only manufacturer left today.. article should be deleted & replaced with an article on pure cane syrup, if anything —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.74.13.109 (talk) 07:15, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. An article about cane syrup without being about a specific company would be better. If such an article is too small, it might be better as a section in one of the articles about sugar. By the way, I changed the name of this section. SlowJog (talk) 03:59, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the sources that talk about cane syrup focus on Steen's, and I think the notability of the product is reasonably clear. I've added some content and sources. Having said that, it might still be better to refocus the article on cane syrup in general, while still using the content about Steen's. In either event, this article is not appropriate for summary deletion under WP:Proposed deletion, which is intended for articles whose deletion is expected to be uncontroversial. I've removed the prod notice, but I am open to the possibility that the article might be renamed to cane syrup and reworded accordingly; in that event the current title Steen's cane syrup would become a redirect to cane syrup, but I think nearly all of the current content would still be usable. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:46, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}