Talk:Sanctuary Review Committee

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Resources[edit]

According to a report on a presentation by Arthur Patrick, the following recent scholars have "contributed to a better understanding of the issues canvassed at Glacier View": Rolf Poehler, Fritz Guy, Alden Thompson, Kai Arasola and Ray Roennfeldt.[1] Colin MacLaurin 08:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We need more material from such groups as the Biblical Research Institute and ATS/JATS. Colin MacLaurin 19:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC) Reaffirming this statement - need more official sources, and conservative if available. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 11:14, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Title change[edit]

Should we rename this article? "Sanctuary Review Committee" is one possible official title. "Sacking of Desmond Ford" is more descriptive (would need to consult standard neutral word for "sacking") than the obscure "Glacier View...". Colin MacLaurin (talk) 10:52, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]