Talk:River Kemp

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shropshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shropshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Shropshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShropshireWikipedia:WikiProject ShropshireTemplate:WikiProject ShropshireShropshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ways to improve River Kemp[edit]

Hi, I'm Ormr2014. Jokulhlaup, thanks for creating River Kemp!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please include additional information and references. Could us a mini map as well. The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ormr2014 (talk) 14:46, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments, the article was created as a minimal start page for the river. Yes, it could be improved by additional information, and with a map. What is included is adequately referenced, and due to length is a Start class, in that it has more than 250 words of prose, hence the removal of the tags...Jokulhlaup (talk) 17:45, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]