Talk:Ramnefjellsfossen

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Rivers: Waterfalls Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force.

Waterfalls

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Waterfalls, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Waterfalls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterfallsWikipedia:WikiProject WaterfallsTemplate:WikiProject WaterfallsWaterfalls articles

Comment[edit]

--Kinopanorama widescreen 19:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)I do not recommend the merging of Ramnefjellsfossen with that of Utigordsfossen, the same waterfalls, due to the the fact that Utigordsfossen, although the older of the two names, is often cited in books at the correct name for the falls.[reply]

Jeremy Sefton-Parke kinopanorama@msn.com

If it is the same waterfall, with two different names (old and new), then there is no question, it should be one article. There will be a redirect from the old name. Egil 15:27, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merged content from Utigardsfossen[edit]

History was:

15:07, 23 February 2006 Edd Porter m (Wikified and reworked some of the grammar)
05:05, 23 February 2006 Avalon (merge - 2 names for same thing)
10:15, 11 February 2006 Wtwilson3 (Tagged Wikify & stub)
00:53, 25 July 2005 139.168.192.169
00:05, 25 July 2005 Fifthcontinent

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ramnefjellsfossen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311112554/http://nrk.no/redskap/utskriftsvennlig/1772975.html to http://nrk.no/redskap/utskriftsvennlig/1772975.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]