Talk:Poppets Town

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	A production section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section discusses the "behind the scenes" aspects of the production process, award nominations, and insights into the casting and staffing where possible.
	A response section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section should be well cited using neutral and reliable sources that discuss the reaction of both critics and the viewing audience to the show. Additionally, document any impact the show has had on society, and merchandise that may have resulted from the show, such as toys, games, etc.

Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because it isn't even notable. There is only one episode available on YouTube, which does not have enough information on it to quickly summarize the entire show. Furthermore, the article has many speculations. --118.92.17.187 (talk) 08:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Being on YouTube is not really a good indicator of notability... there are many notable TV shows that don’t have episodes on YouTube... and many non-notable TV shows that do.

That said, I have to agree that this article (in its current state) does not properly establish why its subject is notable. What is needed is some discussion of things beyond mere existence. Do independent reliable sources talk about it? If so, what do they say? Blueboar (talk) 20:59, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there are independent sources. I added a couple. BTW, you have also search in 3 more languages: French, Spanish and Japanese. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good... so the next step is to include some sort of statement about what makes the show unique... what makes it stand out from other children’s shows. What do the sources think about the show? Has it been nominated for awards? Do critics applaud it, or have they panned it? We need a bit more depth here. A “Reception and reviews” section (for example) would establish notability quite well. Blueboar (talk) 20:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style[edit]

@Calebculmer54: There are two edits being consistently re-applied with no explanation or edit summary. First is the table of international broadcasts, and the other is date formatting (or rather "unformatting") in the episode table. Per the manual of style: Wikipedia is not a television guide, do not include an indiscriminate list of every network that a series appeared on in countries outside the country of production. This table provides no context, nor any reason why each of these is in any way notable. Please refer to MOS:TVINTL. Secondly, per the template documentation Template:Episode list, OriginalAirDate uses the {{Start date|YYYY|MM|DD|df=y}} template format. There are reasons why we do it this way, so leave the existing formatting in place. ButlerBlog (talk) 01:19, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]