Talk:Pishan hostage crisis

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality[edit]

@American Starkiller, Cattus, CentreLeftRight, Colipon, Hugo999, and Rigley: One of the central components of this story as it was written when I came across it was that the suspected kidnappers were attempting to reach Pakistan for terrorist training. This claim turned out to be sourced to an anonymous local official quoted in the Chinese state-run tabloid The Global Times. That article's title is "Police shoot dead 7 terrorists in Xinjiang" which is a biased title- the quintessence of fake news. I therefore hid the material in the lead that claimed they were trying to enter Pakistan. There was no real evidence of the claim provided, and a claim asserted without any evidence is dismissed just as easily.

I would say that given what I found here, the tone of the entire article is in serious question. The New York Times was telling us what the Global Times said, but it wasn't actually saying that what the Global Times said was true. Every word in this article must be reassessed according to the actual weight of the evidence for the claims made. Geographyinitiative (talk) 13:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A police officer from the Pishan county Public Security Bureau confirmed to RFA in a phone interview that the group had been trying to leave China.

"The 'traitors' tried to illegally cross the border and seek political asylum from an enemy country," he said.

[1] Geographyinitiative (talk) 13:34, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I never found the 'Mukula village' mentioned in the RFA article. Qoshtagh village seems to refer to the township, now town, of Koxtag (Kuoshi Tage). Geographyinitiative (talk) 13:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mukula is this place: Mokoyla (Q11092937). This Chinese article lists identities of the 6 of 7 of the deceased, along with identities of 2 of 5 captured. Reading between the lines, of the identities released, all deceased were adults and all captured were children children. --Voidvector (talk) 23:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]