Talk:North Cape Tunnel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Facts?[edit]

Facts in this article that can be confirmed by looking at the attached picture:

  • It's a tunnel
  • It's a tunnel going 212 meters below the surface of the ocean
  • It's named "Nordkapptunnelen"
  • It's length is about 6870 meters (note that length posted on signs such as this are rounded to to the closest ten meter)
ZorroIII 22:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like its length should then have been rounded up to 6880 m if its actual length is 6875 m.

I assume m.u.h. is Norwegian for "metres" [or "meters"] "below sea level." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.42.21.9 (talk) 02:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on North Cape Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:55, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]