Talk:Nicotine lozenge

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 September 2019 and 13 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nathan.koreie, MarylynnTrinh, Joe.Li2019, Madelinekelly04. Peer reviewers: Emoon07.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CP133 2019 Group 31 proposed edits[edit]

Add "side effects" and "symptoms of overdose" section
Rewrite the "Dosages" section so it is not in second-person point of view
Add a "See Also" section and link other nicotine replacement therapies (gum, patch, inhaler)
Add a "Adverse Events" Section
Add a "Drug Interaction" section

MarylynnTrinh (talk) 05:34, 16 October 2019 (UTC) MarylynnTrinh (talk) 03:40, 17 October 2019 (UTC) Nathan.koreie (talk) 01:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC) Joe.Li2019 (talk) 22:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Joe.Li2019 (talk) 05:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Joe.Li2019 (talk) 18:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Joe.Li2019 (talk) 07:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Add "Storage and Disposal" section

Madelinekelly04 (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CP133 2019 Group 30 Peer Reviews[edit]

The group made significant improvements to the article by adding sections for dosages, side effects, symptoms of overdose, contraindications, and storage and disposal. They met all of their goals for editing the page and maintained a neutral point of view. Emoon07 (talk) 22:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that Group 31’s edits substantially improved the article by adding various important and relevant sections. They added sections like side effects, see also, and overdose symptoms. The group has achieved most of its overall goals for improvement by adding the sections on side effects, symptoms of overdose, see also, and storage/disposal. However, it does not seem that they have added the section for drug interactions yet. The draft submission reflects a neutral point of view and does not seem to show signs of plagiarism or copyright violation. KinyeeFong (talk) 22:21, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Group 31's reply: We really appreciate your group's feedback! Also thank you so much for letting us know that we forgot to include a drug interactions section. We will make the relevant changes. Joe.Li2019 (talk) 17:59, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This group made significant improvements for this article. They added relevant information such as, the recommended dosing schedule, side effects, and contraindications for the nicotine lozenges. I believe these are all important patient education. In addition, I noticed they linked appropriate articles for more information on other nicotine replacement therapy options, which includes nicotine gum or nicotine patches. All their edits were neutral points, organized, and had no plagiarism. Overall, they did a great job! Itsnancylam14 (talk) 23:08, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe group 31 substantially improved the article by adding sections like side effects, adverse effects, drug interaction, and symptoms of overdose. Further improved the article by rewriting the dosage section and providing a link to other articles relevant to the topic. The group did achieve its overall goals for improvement. The edits formatted are consistent with Wikipedia’s Manuel of style. The title of each section is recognizable. The information provided is concise and supports the topic. Overall this group did a great job. TekTeklehaimanot (talk) 06:21, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]