Talk:NeuCoin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
    1. Dillet, Romain (2015-02-03). "NeuCoin Is A Bitcoin Alternative Designed For Microtransactions". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2015-04-09. Retrieved 2015-04-09.
    2. Reader, Ruth (2015-02-03). "NeuCoin raises $2.25M to be a headache-free take on Bitcoin". VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 2015-04-09. Retrieved 2015-04-09.
    3. Rizzo, Pete (2015-02-03). "Uber, Hotwire Execs Back Micropayments Startup NeuCoin". CoinDesk. Archived from the original on 2015-04-09. Retrieved 2015-04-09.
    4. Fletcher, Katherine (2015-02-12). "Altcoin Profile: NeuCoin". CoinReport. Archived from the original on 2015-04-09. Retrieved 2015-04-09.
    5. Suberg, William (2015-03-26). "NeuCoin Whitepaper Outlines the Math Needed for Proof-of-Stake to go Mainstream". CoinTelegraph. Archived from the original on 2015-04-09. Retrieved 2015-04-09.
    6. Suberg, William (2015-04-03). "NeuCoin Whitepaper Reignites Proof-of-Work vs. Proof-of-Stake Debate". CoinTelegraph. Archived from the original on 2015-04-09. Retrieved 2015-04-09.
    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow NeuCoin to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard (talk) 04:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • The CoinDesk and CoinReport articles in particular provide very detailed profiles of the subject. I am removing the prod. Pinging User:Piotrus per his request in the proposed deletion message. Cunard (talk) 04:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Primary Sources[edit]

A lot of description about the project is based off of the homepage of Neucoin (previously - it is no longer functional) instead of reliable sources. The whole section on 'What was Neucoin' needs to be rewritten as it reads like an advertisement for the project, which doesn't even exist at this stage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Btcgeek (talkcontribs) 21:13, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]