Talk:Mormonism in the 20th century

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inclusion[edit]

Being the first Mormon < insert random profession > from < insert random location > is not a notable enough feat on it's own to merit inclusion on this list. It has nothing to do with being from/for/against any particular location on Earth, or any specific secular profession. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 21:29, 19 February 2013 (UT

Nowhere is a "random" location, especially not to those who live there - that's xenophobic and rude. This is not an American encyclopaedia. Get used to it.
I intend to add info about Brazil, Canada, Korea and NZ, but no doubt you consider these "random locations". The 19th C. timeline includes US (non-federal) state info from Utah, Illinois & Missouri etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.84.1.18 (talkcontribs) 23:33, 19 February 2013‎
I agree that we should not add that so-and-so was the first Mormon <profession> in a particular country or place. I could agree with adding information about Mormon missionaries beginning work in a particular country, but I don't think we need to identify the first <profession> convert or member by name. In the broad scope of Mormon history, missionaries entering a country is a significant event. Being the first <profession> member somewhere is much less so. Good Ol’factory (talk) 20:51, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As 80.84.1.18 objects to the use of the word "random" in my leading comment, I withdraw it; I'm sorry if anyone took offense, as that was not my intent. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 22:10, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I understood it to just mean that you weren't criticising the inclusion of any one particular location's details—just that there were several and that there was no connection between the multiple locations and that you thought including this information for all of them—as opposed to just some of them—were problematic. I don't think it was any kind of slur, but even if it was, it was an equal opportunity slur. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mormonism in the 20th century. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mormonism in the 20th century. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]