Talk:Minera Escondida

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2008[edit]

I'm new to this game but I feel the entry could do with a more logical layout e.g. an introductory section, followed by history, then geology, reserves and resources, then the mine and its methods and finally a section on any other aspect of interest. Or does this sound too much like a technical report. I've got lots more information than is in the entry at the moment but I don't want to step on any toes. Any comments????? Mafestel (talk) 21:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

> I would say go for it, it can always be reduced or chaged. By now I think every bit of text you write is enhancing the article. 210.80.142.30 (talk) 23:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the whole thing, I hope for the best, and look forward to commentsMafestel (talk) 13:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

Tazmaniacs, the Spanish original of the remark you are quoting is "Chile: Trabajadores de la mina de cobre Escondida demandan a la empresa" which means that the workers are making demands of the company. They are not "demanding the company" which I would say means that they are demanding ownership of the company and I can find no reference to this in anywhere. Maybe you have something that I have missed? Mafestel (talk) 18:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.mining-technology.com/projects/escondida/
    Triggered by \bmining-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 22:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More links and references[edit]

I don't know how to do refs or images, so let me just paste these links here:

About the strike https://www.reuters.com/article/us-chile-copper-escondida-idUSKBN16L1V1

Image https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/43394/escondida-copper-mine-atacama-desert-chile

More images https://earthshots.usgs.gov/earthshots/node/58

Ownership[edit]

I am not sure that you are right on the question of ownership. I seem to remember that JECO and the IFC were in La Escondida before Billiton arrived. Might be worth checking Egoli (talk) 11:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Minera Escondida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse as fake lithium mines[edit]

Pictures of the Escondida copper mine are often presented in anti-Electric-vehicles memes as lithium mine, see Snope article https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/lithium-mine-oil-sands/ --2003:C6:3718:2DA5:D1DC:763C:EF4E:705D (talk) 15:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]