Talk:Mg (text editor)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mg (text editor) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Notability and sources[edit]

Download-sites and existence in various packaging systems do not confer notability. To start, read the relevant guidelines, e.g., reliable sources, notability, third-party sources. So far, no useful sources have been given. TEDickey (talk) 10:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion into, and available from, peer-reviewed third-party packaging systems surely does qualify as a third-party source. The inclusion was not even at all sanctioned by the developers upstream (e.g., not by anyone who worked on this in the OpenBSD tree, from what I could tell, and mg is not even available for download directly from OpenBSD, where it is maintained) — it was an independent action by independent actors. MureninC (talk) 07:46, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The guidelines for notability do not pay any attention to that sort of thing. You might try reading the guidelines, to make the discussion focused. TEDickey (talk) 09:15, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources for widely distributed software that pre-dates the public Internet? Tricky. Are there reliable links to archived USENET newsgroups? Might be articles in old print magazines, but not(?) online. We are talking about an editor that was ported to many platforms, and has survived to the present. That is notable, as software goes. pbannister (talk) 22:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to see what I could learn about mg. It's the kind of subject Wikipedia covers, and is expected to cover, and informs those like me who use Wikipedia for information. My only complaint is that the stub isn't long enough. I'd like to know a little more than ~ derived from EMACS ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.162.148 (talk) 05:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]