Talk:Manchester cotton warehouses

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Greater Manchester

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge[edit]

I suggest this is merged with Manchester cotton warehouses as it is obviously going to contain the same information or the information at Manchester cotton warehouses is merged into this article. Either way duplication seems pointless.J3Mrs (talk) 08:16, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind. The list is incomplete, there are many more 19/20C warehouses in Manchester and I need to reference them all as well so its not finished. But I am not sure when I will have time to finish it so it could take few months yet. Stevo1000 (talk) 05:43, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest otherwise at the moment see--(talk) there is a lot of effort either way. @User:Stevo1000. Didn't see this before commenting on your talk page. —Preceding undated comment added 09:29, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manchester cotton warehouses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120311224311/http://www.mace.manchester.ac.uk/undergraduate/whymace/civil/trail/xml/Features/warehouses.html to http://www.mace.manchester.ac.uk/undergraduate/whymace/civil/trail/xml/Features/warehouses.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manchester cotton warehouses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120127194533/http://www.manchester2002-uk.com/history/victorian/Victorian3.html to http://www.manchester2002-uk.com/history/victorian/Victorian3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Book[edit]

The title of Hartwell's book is "Manchester" and it is in a series called "Pevsner Architectural Guides".--Johnsoniensis (talk) 12:36, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conventionally this would be rendered as I had done it: "Pevsner Architectural Guides: Manchester" (and a semicolon would, in my opinion, be distinctly unconventional). I've changed the reference to use the "series" parameter of the {{cite book}} template and it now renders as follows, which is the default for the template. Hope that's an acceptable compromise.

Hartwell, Clare (2001). Manchester. Pevsner Architectural Guides. London: Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-071131-7.

Dave.Dunford (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; there is great variation in the style in which citations are written and many articles have not been made to conform to the manual of style yet.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 19:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. That's one reason I like to use the {{cite}} templates. The template imposes a consistent style, and if it's wrong it can be corrected in one place and will be reflected in all citations that use the template. Glad we found an acceptable solution. Dave.Dunford (talk) 12:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]