This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Suggest to change second paragraph of Career: Beyak is critical of the findings of the Truth ... and put it under a new separate "Controversy" section. Now wiki (talk) 23:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: please see WP:CSECTION and let me know if there is a better name for the section — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reply - Just read this and thought I would chime in here. CSection prevents any separate section for being in line with Wikipedia's manual of style, but in this case it is even more important not to separate the material, as it is what she is best known for and what the majority of reliable sources have covered. Isingness (talk) 00:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Regarding the second sentence of the second para. of Career section, "Beyak said that those findings overshadowed the 'good deeds' of ...", but according to a different source, it's reported that she said: 'Mistakes were made at residential schools – in many instances, horrible mistakes that overshadowed some good things that also happened at those schools,'. Should the word "the" be changed to "some"? Now wiki (talk) 15:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that sentence would read well after this change, and the meaning is not significantly different ... — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:03, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I believe we need to edit "considered offensive toward First Nations peoples" to "considered racist toward First Nations peoples. Pattycursed (talk) 00:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We now know the extent of the devastation of the residential school system here in Canada. Please remove any mention of this woman from anyone's view. At the very least put this one of the dark web. Please. 216.26.201.115 (talk) 11:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: please see WP:CSECTION and let me know if there is a better name for the section — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)